Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-03-2013, 07:49 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,075,809 times
Reputation: 3954

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
No, my name isn't in any of the lawsuits.
So what? You still lost.

 
Old 05-03-2013, 07:54 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,009 posts, read 44,813,405 times
Reputation: 13707
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
We are both.

From Wong Kim Ark:
Convertible does not mean that we're both. It also means that the two terms do NOT mean the same thing.

Quote:
SCOTUS has spoken.
Indeed. Most recently stating who is a "natural born citizen" in 1939, AFTER Wong Kim Ark:
Quote:
Miss Elg was born in Brooklyn, New York, on October 2, 1907. Her parents, who were natives of Sweden, emigrated to the United States sometime prior to 1906 and her father was naturalized here in that year. The court below, properly recognizing the existence of an actual controversy with the defendants (Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Haworth, 300 U.S. 227, 57 S.Ct. 461, 81 L.Ed. 617, 108 A.L.R. 1000), declared Miss Elg 'to be a natural born citizen of the United States' (99 F.2d 414)
PERKINS, Secretary of Labor, et al. v. ELG. ELG v. PERKINS, Secretary of Labor, et al. | Supreme Court | LII / Legal Information Institute

Natural born citizen = born in the U.S. to two U.S. citizen parents. Elg v. Perkins, 1939.

There has never been a U.S. Supreme Court case which referred to anyone other than one born in the U.S. to two U.S. citizen parents specifically as a "natural born citizen."

There have been multiple U.S. Supreme Court cases which DO refer to one born in the U.S. to two U.S. citizen parents specifically as a "natural born citizen." Elg v. Perkins in 1939 is just the most recent.
 
Old 05-03-2013, 08:03 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,009 posts, read 44,813,405 times
Reputation: 13707
Quote:
Originally Posted by djmilf View Post
Regarding the citizen vs subject concept: all of us are citizens of the United States and are also subject to the laws of the nation, at the national, state and local levels.
No, not all of us are citizens. There are transient aliens in our midst who may or may not be subject to some or all national, state, and local laws. The U.S. State Dept admits that conflicts may arise when one is subject to a foreign country's laws.
Quote:
So what are you saying, InformedConsent? That you aren't subject to the laws of the United States nor to the state and local laws?
I am because I'm a citizen born without any foreign allegiance whatsoever. I wasn't subject to a foreign country's jurisdiction at birth like Obama was, admittedly by the DNC who clearly stated that Obama's status was "GOVERNED" (EXACT quote) by the British Nationality Act of 1948.
 
Old 05-03-2013, 08:07 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,075,809 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Convertible does not mean that we're both. It also means that the two terms do NOT mean the same thing.
It says explicitly that we are both.

SCOTUS has spoken.

 
Old 05-03-2013, 08:27 PM
 
8,418 posts, read 7,412,065 times
Reputation: 8767
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
No, not all of us are citizens. There are transient aliens in our midst who may or may not be subject to some or all national, state, and local laws. The U.S. State Dept admits that conflicts may arise when one is subject to a foreign country's laws.
The only transient aliens who are not subject to national, state or local laws within the United States are foreign ambassadors and diplomats.

Or perhaps you were thinking of some other classification of transient aliens...



Quote:
So what are you saying, InformedConsent? That you aren't subject to the laws of the United States nor to the state and local laws?
Quote:
I am because I'm a citizen born without any foreign allegiance whatsoever.
OK, you are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. Or more succinctly, you are a subject.

But being a citizen has nothing to do with your status as a subject to federal, state and/or local jurisdiction.

Not having foreign allegiance also has nothing to do with your status as a subject to local, state and federal jurisdiction.

Heck, if citizenship and lack of foreign allegiance were required for being subject to the laws of the land, then Japanese tourists wouldn't be bound by any federal, state or local laws when they visited the United States.

Quote:
I wasn't subject to a foreign country's jurisdiction at birth like Obama was, admittedly by the DNC who clearly stated that Obama's status was "GOVERNED" (EXACT quote) by the British Nationality Act of 1948.
And....we're off to deflection land! The question was about YOU, not about Barack Obama.
 
Old 05-03-2013, 08:34 PM
 
Location: Jacurutu
5,299 posts, read 4,847,096 times
Reputation: 603
Quote:
Originally Posted by djmilf View Post
OK, you are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. Or more succinctly, you are a subject.

But being a citizen has nothing to do with your status as a subject to federal, state and/or local jurisdiction.

Not having foreign allegiance also has nothing to do with your status as a subject to local, state and federal jurisdiction.


Heck, if citizenship and lack of foreign allegiance were required for being subject to the laws of the land, then Japanese tourists wouldn't be bound by any federal, state or local laws when they visited the United States...
Absolutely correct...
 
Old 05-03-2013, 08:39 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,009 posts, read 44,813,405 times
Reputation: 13707
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
It says explicitly that we are both.
U.S. citizens are NOT subjects.

Thomas Jefferson deliberately struck the word "subjects" from the Declaration of Independence and replaced it with "citizens."
Jefferson changed 'subjects' to 'citizens' in Declaration of Independence

What a shame you know so little history, HD. Perhaps you should change your username.
 
Old 05-03-2013, 08:42 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,009 posts, read 44,813,405 times
Reputation: 13707
Quote:
Originally Posted by djmilf View Post
The only transient aliens who are not subject to national, state or local laws within the United States are foreign ambassadors and diplomats.
False. The laws requiring jury duty, for example... Transient aliens are NOT subject to those laws.
 
Old 05-03-2013, 08:44 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,009 posts, read 44,813,405 times
Reputation: 13707
Quote:
Originally Posted by IBMMuseum View Post
Absolutely correct...
False. Jury duty laws have been given as an example.
 
Old 05-03-2013, 08:47 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,009 posts, read 44,813,405 times
Reputation: 13707
Quote:
Originally Posted by djmilf View Post
The question was about YOU, not about Barack Obama.
The answer is the same. I wasn't subject to a foreign country's jurisdiction at birth like Obama was, admittedly by the DNC who clearly stated that Obama's status was "GOVERNED" (EXACT quote) by the British Nationality Act of 1948.

I'm an example of someone born NOT subject to a foreign country's jurisdiction at birth. Obama is an example of someone whose status was "GOVERNED" (EXACT quote) by a foreign power.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:44 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top