Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
And for that reason he's got nothing substantive done since 2009.
He has done a lot, just things I am sure you are very much against. Funny how you far right Cons have already forgotten about 2012 and what's his name that ran against Obama.
He has done a lot, just things I am sure you are very much against. Funny how you far right Cons have already forgotten about 2012 and what's his name that ran against Obama.
I can't think of anything substantive he's gotten done since 2009.
He has done a lot, just things I am sure you are very much against. Funny how you far right Cons have already forgotten about 2012 and what's his name that ran against Obama.
no, no, no, all we've heard from these left wing kooks is how Obama cant get anything done because the GOP is blocking him..
Um, no. Democrats lost the supermajority on 2010. Zero comparison to 2012. Republicans hold a healthy majority in the House. Did you forget?
Democrats didnt even have a supermajority in 2010.
Democrats only had a supermajority for 3 weeks total out of Obama's entire first 2 years in office and that was all in 2009.
And your response as a whole makes no sense. Democrats had an even larger majority in 2008/2009 than Republicans gained in 2010, so by your own logic, they should have moved left, back then.
Who's denying him credit for winning the election?
There is a huge difference between winning an election, and being an effective leader..
The thread starts out by saying that since the 2010 elections swung republican, Obama should have governed to the right, well in 2012, Democrats retained the Presidency and Senate and made gains in both the senate and House, so Obama should be able to swing left by the OP's logic.
The thread starts out by saying that since the 2010 elections swung republican, Obama should have governed to the right, well in 2012, Democrats retained the Presidency and Senate and made gains in both the senate and House, so Obama should be able to swing left by the OP's logic.
The President got less votes in 2012 then he did in 2008, once again, had he moved to the right, he would have increased his support, thereby giving him a mandate, rather than the bull crap we have now.
Democrats didnt even have a supermajority in 2010.
Democrats only had a supermajority for 3 weeks total out of Obama's entire first 2 years in office and that was all in 2009.
And your response as a whole makes no sense. Democrats had an even larger majority in 2008/2009 than Republicans gained in 2010, so by your own logic, they should have moved left, back then.
Keep telling yourself that. That obamacare passed without one single republican vote indicates that for all intents and purposes your revisionist history is pure bunk.
The thread starts out by saying that since the 2010 elections swung republican, Obama should have governed to the right, well in 2012, Democrats retained the Presidency and Senate and made gains in both the senate and House, so Obama should be able to swing left by the OP's logic.
Your logic doesn't even pass the laugh test. By all means, tell us how swinging left would help the President considering that the GOP holds the House? That's just ignorant. Care to think this through before posting?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.