Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-30-2013, 09:01 PM
 
Location: Minnesota
5,147 posts, read 7,473,761 times
Reputation: 1578

Advertisements

We all saw how the sequester screwed up air schedules. That suggests a trust fund to support air traffic funded by fees. Got me to thinking. What about taxing the weight and/or measurements of travelers. That would be a gold mine, given how the junk food industry keeps raising our average weight and dimensions . Finally a financial reward for all those hours some of us spend running and sweating.

A second idea: How about those who don't want TSA to fondle their junk pay whatever the traffic will bear I wonder what the ceiling would be where people would finally decide "I'd rather have my junk fondled than pay TSA to avoid it". Maybe they could pilot it at Atlanta, the busiest airport.

Just two ideas that amuse me while not requiring general increases in tax.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-30-2013, 09:16 PM
 
Location: Where they serve real ale.
7,242 posts, read 7,904,172 times
Reputation: 3497
How would it be a tax when it is a private company charging a fee for a service? All they're saying is if you're so fat you take up two seats then you have to pay for both seats and if you don't like it take a different carrier or find other means to travel. That sounds fair to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-30-2013, 10:11 PM
 
Location: Minnesota
5,147 posts, read 7,473,761 times
Reputation: 1578
I'm not referring to that idea that is being bandied about. That was to go into airline profit. My idea would be to provide money to keep the aviation traffic going rather than getting bogged down in the congressional stalemate. It definitely is a user fee just like the tax on gas. On the one hand, flights costs more. On the other hand, revenue shortfalls don't cause cancellations and missed connections.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:26 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top