U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: How should U.S. citizens be taxed?
Flat percentage rate 20 27.78%
Income based percentage brackets 20 27.78%
Spending based 18 25.00%
A combination of these methods 8 11.11%
Other 6 8.33%
Voters: 72. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
Old 11-07-2007, 09:17 AM
4,270 posts, read 13,936,969 times
Reputation: 3350


Point taken Greg and sadly enough, no I have not so I guess I can't say much.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Old 11-07-2007, 09:25 AM
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,505 posts, read 51,140,619 times
Reputation: 24606
Try it. You will likely be surprised at how attentive they can be. Some actually like to hear from constituents instead of lobbyists. My congress critter, Carolyn Shea-Porter has responded with form letters at least.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 11-07-2007, 09:27 AM
4,270 posts, read 13,936,969 times
Reputation: 3350
I'm not really into politics so it never really dawned on my to be an activist. With such an important election coming up though, I guess I should "walk the walk" and not "talk the talk", eh?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 11-07-2007, 10:44 AM
208 posts, read 367,353 times
Reputation: 252
Income tax is a total sham and does not fund the government.

Nevertheless, I can't imagine our nation doing away with it. They need the starving huddled masses contained, controlled and nipping at one another.

Originally Posted by odinloki1 View Post
If our free market is so great, why do we continue to have such a huge gap between rich and poor. Why has the poverty rate increased since the Bush tax cuts. Why when compared with other industrialized countries in terms of economic mobility (the ability to jump up in terms of income bracket) we so often rank near the bottom?

The only real solution to make America a land where all are created equal is the use of government as an equalizer.
Government doesn't equalize people. Politics does. An answer to your question can be found here (broken link).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 11-11-2007, 10:53 PM
2,691 posts, read 3,094,166 times
Reputation: 980
Originally Posted by chele123 View Post
We can keep it as complicated as it is - bottom line is that the rich will always be able to build in tax loop holes, leaving the middle class to pay the taxes for all.
In my opinion 15% of my income represents as much to me as 15% of your income does to you. Last time I figured my taxes after all the ducking and diving it seems it came out to about 15% of my gross income. Plus, I had to pay a tax accountant to do my complicated taxes! To me a flat tax would net the most for the government AND me.
15% for a person making 30,000 a year is 4,500, that could cover food or a few months of rent or housing payments.

15% of $100,000 is 15 grand they still make 85K and they aren't starving, they might have to wait a year before buying a shiny new car.

What about someone making 200K a year or a million a year? They really should only pay 15%? Then they're gonna give all that money they saved on taxes to charities or hire more workers? Thats the trickle down economics that everyone believes in right?

That was the idea behind the Bush tax cuts of '01 and '03 and amazingly our poverty rate has increased . That was the idea behind the dividends tax cut so people with money could make more money of of that which they invest. Yet still the poverty rate has increased .?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 11-12-2007, 07:13 AM
Location: Earth
24,639 posts, read 24,724,173 times
Reputation: 11317
good point, odinloki1.

I believe that a straight 15, no loopholes would still get the top 1% paying more than they do now. I could be wrong, and haven't researched the data. I could also agree with 15% for one bracket and 20-25% for a higher one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.

Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. | Please obey Forum Rules | Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top