U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-05-2013, 12:09 AM
 
Location: Houston
5,315 posts, read 2,700,356 times
Reputation: 3269

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
The fossil record contains zero evidence of any transitional fossils.

Try again, Mr. Evolutionist.

You believe in a fairy tale, my friend.
Oh yeah, I forgot, the entire fossil record was planted by a devil to trick us. Yeah that's not a fairy tale.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-05-2013, 12:10 AM
 
Location: SE Mass
144 posts, read 105,092 times
Reputation: 71
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
We know much about gravity.

We know nothing about macroevolution, becauae it does not occur.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2013, 12:10 AM
 
Location: Houston
5,315 posts, read 2,700,356 times
Reputation: 3269
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
We know much about gravity.

We know nothing about macroevolution, becauae it does not occur.
Please show proof to back up this claim.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2013, 12:13 AM
 
Location: SE Mass
144 posts, read 105,092 times
Reputation: 71
Quote:
Originally Posted by ahzzie View Post
Please show proof to back up this claim.
Oh no, you walked right into it! You asked him to prove a negative.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2013, 12:13 AM
 
19,952 posts, read 13,536,116 times
Reputation: 1973
Quote:
Originally Posted by ahzzie View Post
Really? And what are these assumptions?
That the rate of radioactive decay has been constant is one. The age of a layer of sediment is another.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2013, 12:16 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,125 posts, read 21,913,064 times
Reputation: 6128
Quote:
Originally Posted by ahzzie View Post
Please show proof to back up this claim.
Why don't you prove the theory of evolution?

Perhaps you can convince me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2013, 12:17 AM
 
Location: SE Mass
144 posts, read 105,092 times
Reputation: 71
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vizio View Post
That the rate of radioactive decay has been constant is one. The age of a layer of sediment is another.
There's also genetic evidence. One element of which is that it is so improbable that you'd have the same random mutations showing up in a manner consistent with additionally well evidenced evolutionary lineages, again and again for numbers of species, that you'd basically have to assume trickery by some malevolent demiurge if you didn't just go with, "Yeah, evolution is now even more extremely well evidenced."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2013, 12:17 AM
 
Location: Houston
5,315 posts, read 2,700,356 times
Reputation: 3269
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soldier of FORTRAN View Post
Oh no, you walked right into it! You asked him to prove a negative.
LOL yeah. I've asked Harrier for proof to back up his claims in numerous posts and he just can't seem to do it. He's very good at diverting attention away from questions he can't answer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2013, 12:18 AM
 
Location: Houston
5,315 posts, read 2,700,356 times
Reputation: 3269
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
Why don't you prove the theory of evolution?

Perhaps you can convince me.
Observe the fossil record. Done. Your turn.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2013, 12:19 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,125 posts, read 21,913,064 times
Reputation: 6128
Quote:
Originally Posted by ahzzie View Post
LOL yeah. I've ask Harrier for proof to back up his claims in numerous posts and he just can't seem to do it.
Why are you describing yourself?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. | Please obey Forum Rules | Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top