Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-05-2013, 09:06 AM
 
Location: Minnesota
5,147 posts, read 7,445,824 times
Reputation: 1578

Advertisements

Joe Soucheray: Single moms are making us broke - TwinCities.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-05-2013, 09:06 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,183,047 times
Reputation: 27718
Quote:
Originally Posted by ALackOfCreativity View Post
.....and many are not working and on benefits.

Heck, a lot of them are probably also BOTH working and on benefits.

Unless someone wants to go to the effort of getting hard data there's not much further to go with it than that.
More than likely that is the case. Min wage job at FF or the supermarket and SNAP, WIC, medicaid to fill in the gaps. That's what I see in my town.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2013, 09:07 AM
 
10,553 posts, read 9,609,477 times
Reputation: 4784
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Bailing out the banks actually generated a profit to the taxpayer, so it didnt cost us a dime, and no, I didnt support it either.
Bailing out the banks didn't cost taxpayers a dime?----Are you serious?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2013, 09:12 AM
 
1,880 posts, read 2,298,530 times
Reputation: 1480
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
..
But when more than 600 out of every 1,000 children born to women in their early 20s have single mothers, can anybody come up with a percentage for how many of them will flourish?
The article says:

Quote:
more than 600 out of every 1,000 children born to women in their early 20s are unmarried.
not:

Quote:
more than 600 out of every 1,000 children born to women in their early 20s have single mothers
if 42% of those unmarried mothers are single mothers (as a previous link I linked said that 58% of unmarried mothers are cohabiting), the the figure is more like 240 single mothers per 1000 born to women in their early 20s.

I better get off to bed. Bye all!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2013, 09:12 AM
 
Location: Minnesota
5,147 posts, read 7,445,824 times
Reputation: 1578
Quote:
Originally Posted by ellemint View Post
Bailing out the banks didn't cost taxpayers a dime?----Are you serious?
Amazing what people will say online as if it was revealed truth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2013, 09:18 AM
 
Location: 500 miles from home
33,942 posts, read 22,401,301 times
Reputation: 25806
Quote:
Originally Posted by susankate View Post
No, I am merely pointing out that not all unmarried women are single mothers.

Also, not all those unmarried women, whether cohabiting or single mothers, are claiming benefits.

When the writer of the article says this:

that more than six out of 10 women who give birth in their early 20s are unmarried.

That doesn't automatically mean those 6 out of 10 unmarried mothers in their early 20s are claiming benefits.

Correct me if I am wrong but I seem to be getting the impression that some on here are interpreting:


as meaning:
It's like talking to a rock. Of course, that is exactly how the article is being interpreted because that furthers the OP's political agenda.

Nothing else will be heard.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2013, 09:18 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,183,047 times
Reputation: 27718
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1 View Post
It's like talking to a rock. Of course, that is exactly how the article is being interpreted because that furthers the OP's political agenda.

Nothing else will be heard.
Do you have any statistics to prove it otherwise ?

What's the percentage of single family households in your kid's school ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2013, 09:19 AM
 
1,880 posts, read 2,298,530 times
Reputation: 1480
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beenhere4ever View Post
I was talking about this:
Quote:

It was reported the other day on an inside page of the Pioneer Press
Could someone find that Pioneer Press article?

Btw every single mother I know works and there is a father somewhere in the picture - the average age is about late 20s. Also, I know others who have become single mothers in their late 30s onwards (they've wanted children but given up on finding a husband).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2013, 09:22 AM
 
17,468 posts, read 12,879,601 times
Reputation: 6763
Some people don't realize even our "First Lady" is a single-mom, she said so! Some how it became a slip of the tongue....

I always assumed when my husband worked out of town I was a single-mom.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2013, 09:23 AM
 
3,614 posts, read 3,861,619 times
Reputation: 2272
Quote:
Originally Posted by susankate View Post


if 42% of those unmarried mothers are single mothers (as a previous link I linked said that 58% of unmarried mothers are cohabiting), the the figure is more like 240 single mothers per 1000 born to women in their early 20s.
A single mother cohabitating with a boyfriend who isn't the child's father doesn't adequately provide that kid with one, and it in practice usually doesn't get reported to the government so the welfare (WIC, food stamps, section 8, TANF, etc.) keeps flowing.

I get that you're Australian and haven't seen what goes on in this country, but there are some parts of it where that sort of thing is very common.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top