Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-07-2013, 05:36 AM
 
11,768 posts, read 10,262,817 times
Reputation: 3444

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boss View Post
Wrong, See how the system works before you brand it welfare. The system is and will continue to be sustainable.
The social security administrators disagree with you. You can call it insurance if you want, but after all the semantics people relying on SS are sucking on the gov dole and relying on current workers for their subsistence.

Trustees Report Summary
Social Security Not Sustainable for the Long Term

"The Trust Funds would require another $3.5 trillion in today’s dollars, earning interest at Treasury rates, to pay all scheduled benefits over the next 75 years. This obligation grew $200 billion from last year."

"This report is yet another reminder of what we have known for some time: Social Security's long-term financing problems are very serious, and will not be fixed by wishful thinking alone," said Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security.
"I want to assure those already receiving Social Security benefits – as well as those who are close to retirement – that your benefits are secure. But doing nothing will have serious consequences for our children and grandchildren.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-07-2013, 05:37 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,948,900 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
The difference being, one is taken upon threat of violence and oppression. The other is given upon choice.
One reeks tyranny, the other liberty.


How come I have a choice and you don't? Riddle me that, government slave.
Theft! Tyranny! OK, I hear you. This can’t be argued on rational grounds; I think there are a lot more important moral issues in the world than defending the right of the rich to keep their money, but whatever.

There isn't a place out of Fantasyland where taxes are voluntary. If they were, the greedy wouldn't pay any, which is unfair to everyone else. Simple as that.

Oh, on your earlier claim that 98% don't get back what they pay in, as suspected, it's false:
PolitiFact | Medicare and Social Security: What you paid compared with what you get

Last edited by MTAtech; 05-07-2013 at 06:03 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2013, 05:39 AM
 
Location: Florida
251 posts, read 436,976 times
Reputation: 259
If it was optional more than half of all Americans would have nothing more than their last paycheck saved for retirement at age 65. We all have the option of saving for next WEEK and most don't do it. Expecting the average worker to save and invest for 50 years without losing/dipping into the funds is beyond unrealistic. It's a fairy tale.

Think about all of the people you know right now who are in debt. Upside down on their house, a few credit balances, student loans, medical bills, whatever. Now imagine that they got to keep what the government withheld from their paychecks. Not only would they not be in a healthy position to retire, I would say that most would still be in debt.

Keep in mind that the stock market is at a record high. Even if someone was sitting pretty, say when the last Bush took office, his portfolio would have been nearly cut in half by the time Obama took over. Conversely, the stock market has nearly doubled since Obama took office, but millions of Americans had already sold off all their holdings which render the strong market useless. Those that merely contributed to SS would be the biggest winners.

Like others have mentioned above, there are ways to get around paying SS like being self-employed, not reporting income, or moving out of the country. I wish more people would leave if only to realize how low taxes are in the USA and how average our healthcare and education is. Not to mention how cheap our as prices are compared to everybody else.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2013, 05:41 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,624,265 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
There isn't a place out of Fantasyland where taxes are voluntary. If they were, the greedy wouldn't pay any, which is unfair to everyone else. Simple as that.

There are many taxes you voluntarily pay, today. Don't play stupid with me.
You, as well as I, know our rights are taken daily and given back to us for a tax(fee)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2013, 06:01 AM
 
Location: Minnesota
5,147 posts, read 7,477,557 times
Reputation: 1578
Go live in Asia, OP. Shangrila for people who don't like any sort of social program. Despite the trillions they are making off US consumers, they are NOT spending on a safety net. You'd be "free" in Asia.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2013, 06:05 AM
 
Location: Prepperland
19,025 posts, read 14,205,095 times
Reputation: 16747
Default Voluntary Servitude

No law compels participation, nor punishes non participation. It is 100% voluntary.
"The Social Security Act does not require an individual to have a Social Security Number (SSN) to live and work within the United States, nor does it require an SSN simply for the purpose of having one..."
- - - The Social Security Administration
http://home.hiwaay.net/~becraft/ScottSSNLetter.pdf

Social Security Online History Pages
Property Rights: The Hidden Issue of Social Security Reform, Cato Social Security Choice Paper No. 19
"One of the most enduring myths of Social Security is that a worker has a legal right to his Social Security benefits. Many workers assume that, if they pay Social Security taxes into the system, they have some sort of legal guarantee to the system's benefits. The truth is exactly the opposite. It has long been law that there is no legal right to Social Security. In two important cases, Helvering v. Davis and Flemming v. Nestor,the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Social Security taxes are simply taxes and convey no property or contractual rights to Social Security benefits."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2013, 06:06 AM
 
11,768 posts, read 10,262,817 times
Reputation: 3444
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beenhere4ever View Post
Go live in Asia, OP. Shangrila for people who don't like any sort of social program. Despite the trillions they are making off US consumers, they are NOT spending on a safety net. You'd be "free" in Asia.
China, Japan, India, and most other Asian countries have a social safety net.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2013, 06:06 AM
 
Location: Sonoran Desert
39,078 posts, read 51,231,444 times
Reputation: 28324
If you did not save for your retirement (which is very difficult for most) then you will be a burden on the rest of us when you get old. I would be in favor of just killing you rather than spend tax money to keep you alive if you waived SS and then could not take care of yourself, but that won't fly so we will all have to chip in to pay for your irresponsibility. The same would apply to disability - social security covers that too. If you become ill or injured and can't work, you had better have planned for that, bought long term disability insurance when you were young and able (but broke). And your dependents? Well, I hope you put enough away to keep a roof over their head and food in their mouths should you die prematurely. Social security pays out for them too should you die or become disabled while they still need you. Lastly, should you loose your job temporarily, you had better not tap that nest egg you put away. And don't borrow from it to buy a jet ski either! With SS you can't do those things so you know it will be around for you.

My bet is that you won't save, won't buy disability coverage, won't put money away for the care of your dependents and if you do you will spend the money on emergencies or frivolities and not have enough left to cover your needs. You will spend your money on a car or a stereo or guns, beer and good times and rarely if ever save anything. And even if YOU won't, the average Joe will at least when they are under 50 or so and all that stuff seems so, so far away.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2013, 06:07 AM
 
Location: Minnesota
5,147 posts, read 7,477,557 times
Reputation: 1578
Quote:
Originally Posted by lycos679 View Post
China, Japan, India, and most other Asian countries have a social safety net.
Show me where you read that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2013, 06:10 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,948,900 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetgraphics View Post
No law compels participation, nor punishes non participation. It is 100% voluntary.
"The Social Security Act does not require an individual to have a Social Security Number (SSN) to live and work within the United States, nor does it require an SSN simply for the purpose of having one..."
- - - The Social Security Administration
http://home.hiwaay.net/~becraft/ScottSSNLetter.pdf

Social Security Online History Pages
Property Rights: The Hidden Issue of Social Security Reform, Cato Social Security Choice Paper No. 19
"One of the most enduring myths of Social Security is that a worker has a legal right to his Social Security benefits. Many workers assume that, if they pay Social Security taxes into the system, they have some sort of legal guarantee to the system's benefits. The truth is exactly the opposite. It has long been law that there is no legal right to Social Security. In two important cases, Helvering v. Davis and Flemming v. Nestor,the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Social Security taxes are simply taxes and convey no property or contractual rights to Social Security benefits."
That's misinformation, which underscores why one shouldn't use survivalist and fringe websites as source information.

This is from the Social Security Administration website:

Quote:
Specific laws require a person to provide his or her Social Security number for certain purposes. While we cannot give you a comprehensive list of all situations where a Social Security number might be required or requested, a Social Security number is required or requested by the following organizations:

Internal Revenue Service for tax returns and federal loans;
Employers for wage and tax reporting purposes;
Employers enrolled in E-Verify;
States for the school lunch program;
Banks for monetary transactions;
Veterans Administration as a hospital admission number;
Department of Labor for workers’ compensation;
Department of Education for Student Loans;
States to administer any tax, general public assistance, motor vehicle or drivers license law within its jurisdiction;
States for child support enforcement;
States for commercial drivers’ licenses;
States for Food Stamps;
States for Medicaid;
States for Unemployment Compensation;
States for Temporary Assistance to Needy Families; or
U.S. Treasury for U.S. Savings Bonds
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:02 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top