Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-08-2013, 09:21 AM
 
Location: Lower east side of Toronto
10,567 posts, read 12,784,973 times
Reputation: 9399

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
Yeah they weren't qualified...Yeah right, they just figured this out? Don't believe the partisan hype here. The upper brass is just trying to get rid of the ones who WOULD launch a retaliatory attack. They don't want us nuking anyone back if we get nuked.
That makes sense to me...seeing that no one did anything relevant regarding 9 11 - I don't see the attitude changing. Heaven forbid that someone nuke an American city - that might cause someone to send a nuke back...to the wrong place. I still can't get over whey administrators never held Saudi Arabia to task?

So put it this way. Some wack job supported by Saudi Arabia sets of a suit case nuke on American soil....and with no hesitation America nukes Iran...makes sense to me.....America has this tendency to suck up to their abusers like a beaten child. Now the question of Obama holding the nuclear trigger...that's kind of like wimp with a big club that is to heavy for him to lift and swing...I guess he will be like the kid in the school yard who bribes the bully.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-08-2013, 09:24 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,432,455 times
Reputation: 24780
Smile Illiteracy and Obamaphobia: the link in these afflictions

Quote:
Originally Posted by All American NYC View Post
I guess they were not Obamanites.
Guess you didn't read your own link.

From the article:

The move comes on the heels of a military review that found several failings in the officers’ unit, the 91st Missile Wing at Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota, CBS reported. In March, inspectors gave the officers the grade of “D” on their mastery of Minuteman III missile launch operations.
Read more: Air Force strips 17 officers of power to launch nuclear missiles - Washington Times



Good job, AFIG group. We don't want semicompetent officers in those billets.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2013, 09:24 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,903,978 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
Yeah they weren't qualified...Yeah right, they just figured this out? Don't believe the partisan hype here. The upper brass is just trying to get rid of the ones who WOULD launch a retaliatory attack. They don't want us nuking anyone back if we get nuked.
What information do you have to dispute the news report or do you just make up your own alternate set of facts grabbed from thin air?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2013, 09:26 AM
 
46,861 posts, read 25,814,930 times
Reputation: 29335
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerLily24 View Post
And a "guess" is all it would be. It says right in your link that they weren't qualified.
Do you want people who aren't properly trained carrying these responsibilities?
Obama did it, hence bad. Four legs good, two legs bad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2013, 09:27 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 63,946,516 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerLily24 View Post
And a "guess" is all it would be. It says right in your link that they weren't qualified.
Do you want people who aren't properly trained carrying these responsibilities?
We elected one to the White House, do you really want an answer to that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2013, 09:28 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,432,455 times
Reputation: 24780
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
What information do you have to dispute the news report or do you just make up your own alternate set of facts grabbed from thin air?

Conservobots have done this very consistently over the past 5 years. And then spew phony outrage over their fantasies. Must be a mental condition of some kind. see: Glen Beck
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2013, 09:30 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,903,978 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerLily24
And a "guess" is all it would be. It says right in your link that they weren't qualified.
Do you want people who aren't properly trained carrying these responsibilities?
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
We elected one to the White House, do you really want an answer to that?
He is certainly far more qualified than his immediate predecessor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2013, 09:32 AM
 
46,861 posts, read 25,814,930 times
Reputation: 29335
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
Yeah they weren't qualified...Yeah right, they just figured this out? Don't believe the partisan hype here. The upper brass is just trying to get rid of the ones who WOULD launch a retaliatory attack. They don't want us nuking anyone back if we get nuked.
Seeing as that decision rests with national command authority, not the individual officers, I'd say that any officer who would let his own convictions influence a launch decision needs to be removed from his post, pronto. Luckily, the scenario you describe is just a little garden-variety right-wing hypothetical plucked out of thin air and based on nothing. It appears they simply weren't competent in carrying out their tasks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2013, 09:33 AM
 
Location: Central Texas
13,715 posts, read 31,072,217 times
Reputation: 9270
Quote:
Originally Posted by All American NYC View Post
I guess they were not Obamanites.
How do you reach the conclusion that this is politically motivated?

The Air Force absolutely needs to be sure that the right people are in charge of this activity. There have been a number of issues with the DoD's management of its nuclear arsenal over the years going back to GWB's time. And when they find incompetence, they should fix it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2013, 09:33 AM
 
4,837 posts, read 4,157,400 times
Reputation: 1848
Do you people on the right see boogeyman every time you turn your head? The level of paranoia & suspicion is staggering.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top