U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-10-2013, 08:53 PM
 
Location: NC
1,250 posts, read 2,310,503 times
Reputation: 584

Advertisements

So thats how long this BS has been floating around
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-10-2013, 08:54 PM
 
Location: Columbus, OH
3,039 posts, read 2,161,335 times
Reputation: 826
Quote:
Originally Posted by odanny View Post
This information should not be considered an "other controversy", but it is because so many people do not believe in basic science.

What many climate researchers have long sought is a plan to keep levels of carbon dioxide at 350 ppm in the atmosphere, but we've reached a level not seen in millions of years, and it will continue to rise. Instead of working on solutions, we pretend the problem does not exist because of the enormous wealth and influence of the fossil fuel industry. It has corrupted both halls of Congress, while pumping out as much disinformation in the media as it does carbon dioxide.



http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/11/sc...tone.html?_r=0
So we saw these carbon levels 3 milllion years ago?

What did we do then to fix the problem?

Maybe we should all get out our history books and see who was President then and what they did to stop fossil fuel production at that time???

If we are at the same levels as 3 million years ago can we not conclude that humans have no effect on global warming and the "problem" will fix itself. Just like it did before.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2013, 08:55 PM
 
20,978 posts, read 16,215,058 times
Reputation: 10270
Farmers should have a bumper crop this year!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2013, 08:59 PM
 
Location: Planet earth
3,277 posts, read 1,301,767 times
Reputation: 1099
Quote:
Originally Posted by seattlenextyear View Post
Nice plagiarism from this Forbes article: In Their Own Words: Climate Alarmists Debunk Their 'Science' - Forbes

Anything else, this is getting boring for me.

So you can see it is sourced material. For every supposed scientific source you can find that claims AGW, I can find a source, with actual science that uses your sources supposed science and demonstrates the flaws in that supposed science. What's more, I can do it referencing only two (2) sites... Watts Up With That? | The world's most viewed site on global warming and climate change and Climate Audit
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2013, 09:01 PM
 
20,978 posts, read 16,215,058 times
Reputation: 10270
Quote:
Originally Posted by odanny View Post
This information should not be considered an "other controversy", but it is because so many people do not believe in basic science.

What many climate researchers have long sought is a plan to keep levels of carbon dioxide at 350 ppm in the atmosphere, but we've reached a level not seen in millions of years, and it will continue to rise. Instead of working on solutions, we pretend the problem does not exist because of the enormous wealth and influence of the fossil fuel industry. It has corrupted both halls of Congress, while pumping out as much disinformation in the media as it does carbon dioxide.



http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/11/sc...tone.html?_r=0
How do they know that 350 ppm is the correct amount?

Aren't these the same people who predicted an ice age 40 years ago?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2013, 09:10 PM
 
Location: Columbus, OH
3,039 posts, read 2,161,335 times
Reputation: 826
Quote:
Originally Posted by alphamale View Post
How do they know that 350 ppm is the correct amount?

Aren't these the same people who predicted an ice age 40 years ago?

New Ice Age is coming (again).

Russian Scientists say period of global cooling ahead due to changes in the sun | Watts Up With That?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2013, 09:11 PM
 
Location: WA
4,246 posts, read 7,821,965 times
Reputation: 2364
Quote:
Originally Posted by KS_Referee View Post
So you can see it is sourced material. For every supposed scientific source you can find that claims AGW, I can find a source, with actual science that uses your sources supposed science and demonstrates the flaws in that supposed science. What's more, I can do it referencing only two (2) sites... Watts Up With That? | The world's most viewed site on global warming and climate change and Climate Audit
By "sourced material", you mean "he shameless plagiarized without using a citation" and by "actual science" you mean "blogs"

I can just see Librarians around the world, just banging their heads against the wall, muttering "information literacy....information literacy....information literacy"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2013, 09:13 PM
 
Location: WA
4,246 posts, read 7,821,965 times
Reputation: 2364
Quote:
Originally Posted by OhioRules View Post
information literacy... *bang*.... information literacy... *bang* ...information literacy ...*bang*
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2013, 09:24 PM
 
Location: 15 months till retirement and I can leave the hell hole of New Yakistan
25,207 posts, read 13,969,115 times
Reputation: 6462
Quote:
Originally Posted by odanny View Post
Carbon Dioxide Levels Reach 400 ppm: Not Seen in Three Million Years
LIE....

co2 levels were over 700ppm less than 15,000 years ago



the op is not telling the truth....may not be 'his' lie, but he sure is speading it
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2013, 09:27 PM
 
Location: 15 months till retirement and I can leave the hell hole of New Yakistan
25,207 posts, read 13,969,115 times
Reputation: 6462
correct the liberal denialists , do deny SCIENCE


science shows that humans use oxygen and expele (exhale) co2

science shows that greenery (plantlife) uses co2 and expeles o2

science shows that co2 levels have been 3 times HIGHER than they are today, in the past (ie the co2 325(some say as high as 350) of today is is much lower than the 750-10000 that co2 levels were 100,000 years ago

science shows us that the earth has warmed AND cooled many times

science shows us that ANTARTICA was once a lush furtile land, not covered in ice

science shows us that greenland was once a green lush furtile land, not covered with ice

science shows us that GLACIERS created many of the geographical features that we look at today (ie Long Island was made by the lower reaching of graciers, the great lakes were created by glaciers, the grand canyon was created by glacial melting)

science shows us that plants would grow much better, and use less water if the co2 was HIGHER...around 700-1500ppm compared to the current 320ppm

The typical outdoor air we breathe contains 0.03 - 0.045% (300 - 450 ppm) CO2. Research (SCIENCE) demonstrates that optimum growth and production for most plants occur between 1200 - 1500 ppm CO2. These optimum CO2 levels can boost plant metabolism, growth and yield by 25 - 60%.Plants under effective CO2 enrichment and management display thicker, lush green leaves, an abundance of fragrant fruit and flowers, and stronger, more vigorous roots. CO2 enriched plants grow rapidly and must also be supplied with the other five "essential elements" to ensure proper development and a plentiful harvest.


science shows As CO2 is a critical component of growth, plants in environments with inadequate CO2 levels - below 225 ppm - will cease to grow or produce.

SCIENCE shows that plants exposed to elevated CO2 concentrations are likely to lose less water via transpiration



common sense states that as the earths polulation expands, so does the need for more plantlife...to keep our oxygen levels up.............yet the global warming liberals only want to talk about car/industry exaust; man created co2,.... and how to tax it


why do liberals DENY science???...because with the science they cant get their TAX..so they manipulate the science
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:49 PM.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top