Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-19-2013, 08:45 AM
 
1,520 posts, read 1,873,314 times
Reputation: 545

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Well yeah..they need to move to a state where they can get married so they can live together.
Makes you wonder why that morality clause got added to her divorce papers though.
What they can do, and is done in a few cases, would be for one of them to legally "adopt" the other which would then create a legal blood relationship and nullify the judges order. The disadvantage of that is it will also cut off the ability of the adoptee to legally inherit anything from her parent which could be a big disadvantage if her parents hold lots of assets or money. It would enable both partners to inherit from each other should one of them die. It is something I have read that some gay couples are doing to get around laws on estate rights and hospital visitations and such.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-19-2013, 08:47 AM
 
5,261 posts, read 4,154,895 times
Reputation: 2264
Texas? You don't say. When I saw the headline, I figured it must be Massachusetts, Vermont, Wisconsin or Oregon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2013, 08:48 AM
 
Location: Wonderland
67,650 posts, read 60,886,374 times
Reputation: 101078
Quote:
Originally Posted by hammertime33 View Post
I really need to link to the Texas law that bans gay people from marrying one another?


You are asuming that the lesbian couple want to get married. That's not the question at hand and is not addressed in the morality clause in question either. The clause in the divorce decree forbids ANYONE OF ANY SEXfrom being in the house around the kids after 9 pm. Period.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2013, 08:48 AM
 
Location: Geneva, IL
12,980 posts, read 14,560,662 times
Reputation: 14862
Can people honestly say the judge would have passed the same ruling if the mother was living with a boyfriend?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2013, 08:50 AM
 
14,917 posts, read 13,098,699 times
Reputation: 4828
Quote:
Originally Posted by KathrynAragon View Post
You are asuming that the lesbian couple want to get married. That's not the question at hand and is not addressed in the morality clause in question either. The clause in the divorce decree forbids ANYONE OF ANY SEXfrom being in the house around the kids after 9 pm. Period.
I'm not making that assumption.

I'm simply stating they don't have that option under the law (as a straight couple likewise partnered for 3 years and living together would) - hence they are not afforded the same access to the legal protections of the law.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2013, 08:51 AM
 
Location: In your head, rent free
14,888 posts, read 10,031,757 times
Reputation: 7693
Quote:
Originally Posted by hammertime33 View Post
Actually, it has a lot to do with her being gay and marriage equality.
No it doesn't in the least bit, this story like many others is being twisted and used to promote an agenda but in reality it's a legal case about a divorce agreement between 2 people.

I fully support gay rights including gay marriage and adoption but I also support a parent's right to have a say in their kids lives even when they're living with the other parent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2013, 08:53 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,464,288 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by C. Maurio View Post
What they can do, and is done in a few cases, would be for one of them to legally "adopt" the other which would then create a legal blood relationship and nullify the judges order. The disadvantage of that is it will also cut off the ability of the adoptee to legally inherit anything from her parent which could be a big disadvantage if her parents hold lots of assets or money. It would enable both partners to inherit from each other should one of them die. It is something I have read that some gay couples are doing to get around laws on estate rights and hospital visitations and such.
But that would involve the father giving up parental rights.
This case sounds like it was an ugly, messy divorce.
And it could have been the husband bringing this up to get revenge.
And she may not be able to move either if it's in her divorce decree.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2013, 08:54 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,464,288 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zimbochick View Post
Can people honestly say the judge would have passed the same ruling if the mother was living with a boyfriend?
Why not ? What if this is the ex-husband's doing ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2013, 08:54 AM
 
Location: Geneva, IL
12,980 posts, read 14,560,662 times
Reputation: 14862
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMoreYouKnow View Post
I fully support gay rights including gay marriage and adoption but I also support a parent's right to have a say in their kids lives even when they're living with the other parent.
That's great, but in this case the father of the children is not involved per the Dallas news reports, so the only one involving himself in this woman's bedroom is the judge.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2013, 08:55 AM
 
Location: Geneva, IL
12,980 posts, read 14,560,662 times
Reputation: 14862
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Why not ? What if this is the ex-husband's doing ?
Doesn't sound like it from the local news stories.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:24 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top