Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Stop taking talking points, and regurgitating them. Instead, find out what the issue is. To begin with, DOJ is acting within law. The issue, if anything, should be the law that enables it. No?
I think the liberal media are beginning to see the writing on the wall conserning Obama and the curent administration and are beginnig to fear their loss of the fredom of the press.
Exposing the trators for who they are is producing some fire.
This one is tricky. The Justice Department investigation wasn't to stop freedom of speech or freedom of the press--they were investigating a CRIME that threatened national security. What do you do when a member of the press commits a crime in the course of their reporting? Are they above the law? Lots of things to think about.
Not tricky at all. Rosen was never charged. The crime wasn't really a crime, unless you count reporting on something that an informant told you. And what about that informant - why were they never charged and/or have THEIR records seized?
A press that is protected by the first amendment, and CAN and SHOULD report on the goings on of our government is vital to our freedom as a people.
The Justice Department investigation wasn't to stop freedom of speech or freedom of the press--they were investigating a CRIME that threatened national security.
"National security" is a cop-out used by the tyrants of the U.S. government to justify nearly all their actions.
Whether it's cracking down on war protestors, Native American groups, civil rights groups, or Tea Party groups, it's all a ruse to seize more power at the expense of ours.
Not tricky at all. Rosen was never charged. The crime wasn't really a crime, unless you count reporting on something that an informant told you. And what about that informant - why were they never charged and/or have THEIR records seized?
A press that is protected by the first amendment, and CAN and SHOULD report on the goings on of our government is vital to our freedom as a people.
So, perhaps the "liberal media" is in reality no friend to either party and a separate entity driven primarily by the profit motive.
All media is controlled by the 5 biggest corps who CEO's are members of the CFR. They will do whatever the CFR tells them to do. Right or Left.
Nothing like a stupid right/left confrontation to mask over what really is going on.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
