Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-01-2013, 06:09 PM
 
73,014 posts, read 62,607,656 times
Reputation: 21932

Advertisements

Quote:
Based on your comments, you believe that behavior is determined by skin color. In your mind, blacks love to partake in crime and violence, because they are black. You don't seem to understand that poor people in general have limited opportunities and many often get caught up with whatever their particular community values and views as the norm. On the South side of Chicago, the norm is gang banging, so many of the people in those communities, accept it as normal and the children grow up to view it as a way of life.

Since many from the inner city lack proper male role models, they only know what they see, and what the majority of people in their community engage in, and that's largely what they grow up to emulate and become.

If the children from the South side were placed in stable middle class homes that taught good values, the children would mostly grow up to mirror the values that were espoused by their parents and the larger community.
I've been saying similar things. It has alot to do with not being raised right, it has alot to do with having bad role models, or none at all. It has alot to do with many factors. One's race does not make a person commit crimes. That is why I brought up adjusting for factors like education, income, family life, and other issues.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-01-2013, 06:24 PM
 
Location: DFW
40,951 posts, read 49,189,517 times
Reputation: 55008
Chicago needs more Section 8 housing to spread the love into the nicer areas.
Why keep all the violence in just a few areas ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-01-2013, 06:27 PM
 
Location: Chicago
1,466 posts, read 1,229,273 times
Reputation: 523
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rakin View Post
Chicago needs more Section 8 housing to spread the love into the nicer areas.
Why keep all the violence in just a few areas ?
Interesting to see you're making light of all the murders.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-01-2013, 06:29 PM
 
Location: East St. Paul 651 forever (or North St. Paul) .
2,860 posts, read 3,387,163 times
Reputation: 1446
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rakin View Post
Chicago needs more Section 8 housing to spread the love into the nicer areas.
Why keep all the violence in just a few areas ?
Start with Rahm Emanuel and Pat Quinn's neighborhoods.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-01-2013, 08:54 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,180,801 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rakin View Post
Chicago needs more Section 8 housing to spread the love into the nicer areas.
Why keep all the violence in just a few areas ?
Actually it has been proven that it is better to decentralize low income housing to prevent a ghetto effect.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-01-2013, 08:57 PM
 
73,014 posts, read 62,607,656 times
Reputation: 21932
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
Actually it has been proven that it is better to decentralize low income housing to prevent a ghetto effect.
But it won't happen that easily. Alot of people who live in middle-upper income areas don't want low income housing around them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-01-2013, 08:59 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,180,801 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by green_mariner View Post
But it won't happen that easily. Alot of people who live in middle-upper income areas don't want low income housing around them.
Oh it never does, once poverty areas are established it is hard to change.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-01-2013, 09:59 PM
 
Location: East St. Paul 651 forever (or North St. Paul) .
2,860 posts, read 3,387,163 times
Reputation: 1446
Quote:
Originally Posted by green_mariner View Post
But it won't happen that easily. Alot of people who live in middle-upper income areas don't want low income housing around them.
There's a reason for that; two sets of rules for those Capital Hill crooks and their elitist pals, and then us serfs of middle- and lower-incomes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-01-2013, 10:03 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,180,801 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by Govie View Post
There's a reason for that; two sets of rules for those Capital Hill crooks and their elitist pals, and then us serfs of middle- and lower-incomes.
I think you might be talking about something completely different.

Actually there is a way to solve centralized poverty and that is through housing cost credits. In NYC, low income people are given a month amount for housing, it is up to them if they want to spend more of their own money for better housing, but it allows them to live anywhere they want in the city provided it matches what they can afford in rent. That way it eliminates the need for too much low income housing and allows people to live in more places without having to live in centralized ghettos.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-01-2013, 10:13 PM
 
Location: East St. Paul 651 forever (or North St. Paul) .
2,860 posts, read 3,387,163 times
Reputation: 1446
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
I think you might be talking about something completely different.

Actually there is a way to solve centralized poverty and that is through housing cost credits. In NYC, low income people are given a month amount for housing, it is up to them if they want to spend more of their own money for better housing, but it allows them to live anywhere they want in the city provided it matches what they can afford in rent. That way it eliminates the need for too much low income housing and allows people to live in more places without having to live in centralized ghettos.
I'm talking about guys like King Bloomberg, Rahm Emanuel and men of that ilk who live in gated, guarded (heavily) communities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:01 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top