Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-03-2013, 01:14 PM
 
5,150 posts, read 7,764,935 times
Reputation: 1443

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale Cooper View Post
Bend over. It's next...

This is the worst ruling ever.

WASHINGTON — A sharply divided Supreme Court on Monday said police can routinely take DNA from people they arrest, equating a DNA cheek swab to other common jailhouse procedures like fingerprinting.

Supreme Court: DNA Samples Can Be Taken From Arrestees Without Warrant
Thanks for posting before I had to. I was being lazy.

I'm not sure how I feel about it because of the fact our fingerprints can already be taken and booking photos are not only used but released as public records to be sold to suspects that want them taken down for $500.

But Scalia's blast from/for the Left is really good reading (put down any beverages before reading):

"Today’s judgment will, to be sure, have the beneficial effect of solving more crimes; then again, so would the taking of DNA samples from anyone who flies on an air -plane (surely the Transportation
Security Administration needs to know the “identity” of the flying public), applies for a driver’s license, or attends a public school. Perhaps the construction of such a genetic panopticon is wise. But
I doubt that the proud men who wrote the charter of our liberties would have been so eager to open their mouths for royal inspection."

Looks like the 4th, for at least today is a leftie.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-03-2013, 01:14 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,094 posts, read 26,008,825 times
Reputation: 6128
Quote:
Originally Posted by twinArmageddons View Post
Again, what exactly is the issue here? It violates zero rights.
Invasion of privacy.

Violates our right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures.

This is truly a travesty of a ruling.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2013, 01:14 PM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,629,107 times
Reputation: 14806
Dup: Supreme Court Rules Police Can Take DNA Swabs From Arrestees
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2013, 01:16 PM
 
25,619 posts, read 36,701,448 times
Reputation: 23295
Quote:
Originally Posted by twinArmageddons View Post
Again, what exactly is the issue here? It violates zero rights.
Well after this ruling a Majority of SCOTUS agrees with you.

A big hole just got shot thru the 4th.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2013, 01:16 PM
 
Location: Area 51.5
13,887 posts, read 13,671,534 times
Reputation: 9174
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
Thanks, and sorry. I looked for a thread and didn't find one. Didn't look hard enough, I guess.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2013, 01:17 PM
 
8,391 posts, read 6,296,863 times
Reputation: 2314
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale Cooper View Post
Bend over. It's next...

This is the worst ruling ever.

WASHINGTON — A sharply divided Supreme Court on Monday said police can routinely take DNA from people they arrest, equating a DNA cheek swab to other common jailhouse procedures like fingerprinting.

Supreme Court: DNA Samples Can Be Taken From Arrestees Without Warrant
Let's see how long it takes conservatives to admit that it was mostly the conservative justices that voted yes. There are 5 conservative judges and 4 of them voted for this law that is 80% of them.

There are 4 liberal judges and 3 of them voted against it that is 75% of them

conservatives in general support giving more power to police officers and the state to surveil, arrest, detain, lie to, etc and always have. This is why conservatives enthusiastically supported giving GWB those war powers to fight the war on terror.

conservatives are not for smaller government.


The decision sounds terrible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2013, 01:17 PM
 
Location: Virginia Beach
8,346 posts, read 7,044,020 times
Reputation: 2874
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
Invasion of privacy.
I fail to see how.

Taking our DNA will not invade our privacy in the least bit.

Quote:
Violates our right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures.
If this was unreasonable, sure. However, it is not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2013, 01:17 PM
 
25,619 posts, read 36,701,448 times
Reputation: 23295
Quote:
Originally Posted by uggabugga View Post
i agree with scalia.
and so it passes I agree with you
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2013, 01:20 PM
 
25,619 posts, read 36,701,448 times
Reputation: 23295
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Draper View Post
I'm really surprised Scalia came out against this.
I'm not. Just read his opinions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2013, 01:20 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,094 posts, read 26,008,825 times
Reputation: 6128
Wow! A lot of lefties here are agreeing with Clarence Thomas.

Who would have thunk it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:03 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top