Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Not many. Most people have moved on. Just some like you who can't even answer simple questions of what actually happened. All you really know is that something happened and now (or rather, then) its time for screaming and false outrage.
And that is easily seen. As well as something like umbrellagate. Thats why most just tune those like you out.
But rave and rant all you wish. Thats what you know best.
One wouldn't have to ask if the administration was forthcoming like Obama claimed it would be.
"The CIA nor the White House believed it was about a video."
According to the Susan Rice talking points she said, " But our current best assessment, based on the information that we have at present, is that, in fact, what this began as, it was a spontaneous — not a premeditated — response to what had transpired in Cairo. In Cairo, as you know, a few hours earlier, there was a violent protest that was undertaken in reaction to this very offensive video that was disseminated.
And Obama said on about 4 different occasions it WAS on account of the video.
Hillary claimed the same thing.
Both Obama and Hillary told the parents of the deceased at the scene when the body's were returned that they would get the man responsible for the video.
And they did. Unfortunately they have not got any of those actually responsible.
I watched the complete hearings the day Hicks testified. When the "stand down" order was given the U.S personnel in Benghazi had already been evacuated to the Benghazi airport and were being transported to Tripoli. Gibson may have been furious, but it didn't make much sense to send more people to Benghazi when everyone was being evacuated to Tripoli.
One wouldn't have to ask if the administration was forthcoming like Obama claimed it would be.
The questions have been asked, and answered, again and again and again. Nine hearings worth, now. Just because you don't like the answers that have come out of those hearings doesn't mean the administration hasn't been forthcoming. It just means that you don't like the answers. Sounds like that's your problem, as most of the rest of the country has accepted that bad things that are out of our control often happen in places where we have diplomats. Just as they have under many previous administrations.
The questions have been asked, and answered, again and again and again. Nine hearings worth, now. Just because you don't like the answers that have come out of those hearings doesn't mean the administration hasn't been forthcoming. It just means that you don't like the answers. Sounds like that's your problem, as most of the rest of the country has accepted that bad things that are out of our control often happen in places where we have diplomats. Just as they have under many previous administrations.
"Bad things happen" would have been an acceptable excuse. This administration seems to feel they must lie even when the truth is a better answer.
Why weren't all you right-wingers clutching your pearls over the dozen or so attacks on US diplomatic personnel that took place when the torturer Bush was busy failing at his job?
Well the Hearings must be over to make a justification like that. Please index the page in which that determination was made by the committee.
They seem to be sticking to the story.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.