Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-05-2013, 07:45 PM
 
15,523 posts, read 10,487,502 times
Reputation: 15807

Advertisements

If they don't lease or own the 25 feet, Starbucks can't do jack.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-05-2013, 07:47 PM
 
Location: Dublin, CA
3,807 posts, read 4,273,190 times
Reputation: 3984
Quote:
Originally Posted by John1960 View Post
SEATTLE, June 1 (UPI) -- U.S. coffee shop chain Starbucks said it was banning smoking within 25 feet of its stores, effectively including its outdoor seating areas.

AdWeek reported the ban would take effect Saturday and would include electronic cigarettes.

The new rule was receiving mixed reactions from customers, WJXT Jacksonville, Fla., reported.



Read more: Starbucks bans smoking within 25 feet of its stores - UPI.com
Good. Time to ban smoking outright. Absolutely no socially redeeming value to smoking. It stinks, its unhealthy, and costs billions of dollars every year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2013, 08:08 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,702,516 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDGeek View Post
I'm a smoker and a liberal and I don't mind slinking off to a far-away corner to smoke. However, once I'm in an area where smoking is explicitly permitted, I don't want to be harassed by passive-aggressive theatrical coughing and frantic hand waving.
I have no horse in this race. Smoke does not bother me.

Having said this, it bothers me that states and/or municipalities within states, trumped the right of business to decide if they wanted to be a smoking or non smoking establishment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2013, 10:10 PM
 
Location: Coos Bay, Oregon
7,138 posts, read 11,022,539 times
Reputation: 7808
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sco View Post
I predict a lawsuit and a quick end to this policy after an over zealous anti-smoking Starbucks employee attempts to enforce the ban on a person that is on public property. The only legal action that Starbucks could take against a smoker is to call the police and report the person. The police would then have to waste an officer's time by responding and hope that the person is still there so they can catch them in the act. Starbucks employees don't have the authority to force someone to quit smoking on public property no matter how close to the door they might be.
Do you really believe that a big international company like Starbucks hasn't gotten clearance from their legal department before implementing a policy like this?

Hint: don't waste your time suing Starbucks. You will lose.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2013, 02:22 AM
 
Location: California
37,121 posts, read 42,186,006 times
Reputation: 34997
I have mixed feelings. I do think smoking should be discouraged. In a different time and place it would be illegal and I think we all know that. Sometimes there is no real rhyme or reason to our laws.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2013, 06:50 AM
 
Location: Area 51.5
13,887 posts, read 13,663,852 times
Reputation: 9173
Quote:
Originally Posted by gizmo980 View Post
LOL... they'd like to think so, but we just keep on ticking!

(I've partially switched to e-Cigs, but not entirely yet)
Me, too, and the truth is ecigs produce the same vapor as Starbucks' coffee produces. And the flavor I vape is chocolate/coffee. Ironic, huh!

I still smoke about 3-4, maybe 5 real cigs a day, but never in my home or place of business.

To say vaping isn't allowed is ridiculous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2013, 06:53 AM
 
30,058 posts, read 18,650,451 times
Reputation: 20860
Quote:
Originally Posted by John1960 View Post
SEATTLE, June 1 (UPI) -- U.S. coffee shop chain Starbucks said it was banning smoking within 25 feet of its stores, effectively including its outdoor seating areas.

AdWeek reported the ban would take effect Saturday and would include electronic cigarettes.

The new rule was receiving mixed reactions from customers, WJXT Jacksonville, Fla., reported.



Read more: Starbucks bans smoking within 25 feet of its stores - UPI.com

I think I will take up smoking near Starbucks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2013, 07:06 AM
 
Location: So Cal
10,028 posts, read 9,499,127 times
Reputation: 10449
Quote:
Originally Posted by hammertime33 View Post
I don't understand this. How can they ban smoking within 25 feet of their stores? Sure, if they own 25 feet of property surrounding a particular store they can, but where they don't - which I imagine is the case with most of their stores - how can they ban smoking on property that's not theirs?
My guess is they stated 25 feet so they can include the outside patio area. Of course if the property line is 15 feet, there is not much they can do if someone smokes past that line.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2013, 07:26 AM
 
2,635 posts, read 3,509,847 times
Reputation: 1686
Quote:
Originally Posted by elan View Post
If they don't lease or own the 25 feet, Starbucks can't do jack.
FALSE

- If their employees are still on the clock, then they can hold them to this standard.

- If the Starbucks is located in a private development (ie, shopping mall) then they may require a smoke-free zone as part of their lease agreement

- Finally, if the Starbucks is adjacent to public spaces, then there may be local ordinances that can be enforced (no smoking near restaurants, anti-loitering, public nuisance, etc...)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2013, 07:33 AM
 
Location: Chicago
1,466 posts, read 1,228,556 times
Reputation: 523
I don't know how this legal, but it's fine by me if it is.

I was very surprised to see so many posters here outraged by this. Is there that large of a smoking community here?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:37 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top