Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-16-2013, 01:10 AM
 
233 posts, read 238,972 times
Reputation: 140

Advertisements

First let me say, if you knowingly provide inappropriate materials to children, I think you should be locked up. We had a discussion tonight with my nephew and my brother about how a filter placed on his computer and how it is going to block many sites (for my nephew). Reading some of the vocal parents about how it is everyone elses fault their kids are accessing adult chat rooms and adult websites I have to ask if we are taking the wrong approach.

It is 2013. Instead of blaming others for YOU being bad parents, why not put filters on your computers like my brother did (I helped)? I would also like to propose a law to help with it. If you are a parent and your kid accesses adult website and your computer has no filter, you...the parent should be charged criminally. This is just one instance, where I have seen parents today blame others, when they should blame themselves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-16-2013, 01:15 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,094 posts, read 26,008,825 times
Reputation: 6128
How, exactly, would such a law prevent children from viewing online pornography?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2013, 01:20 AM
 
Location: California
37,135 posts, read 42,214,810 times
Reputation: 35013
And why would you want to charge parents criminally? It's not a crime to let minors see adult material regardless of what you think.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2013, 01:20 AM
 
9,229 posts, read 9,758,341 times
Reputation: 3316
Nowadays everyone has a smart phone which can be used to view porn
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2013, 01:21 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,094 posts, read 26,008,825 times
Reputation: 6128
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ceece View Post
And why would you want to charge parents criminally? It's not a crime to let minors see adult material regardless of what you think.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2013, 01:23 AM
 
233 posts, read 238,972 times
Reputation: 140
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
How, exactly, would such a law prevent children from viewing online pornography?
How does a carseat law prevent a child from getting hurt in a crash? A filter prevents the child from having access to adult material on the web. Many of these parents are outraged at the adults in adult chatrooms when their kids hit the "18 and above" buttom on the website. They blame everyone but themselves for putting the filters on the computers that would PREVENT the child from having access in the first place.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2013, 01:26 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,094 posts, read 26,008,825 times
Reputation: 6128
Quote:
Originally Posted by ropes1981 View Post
How does a carseat law prevent a child from getting hurt in a crash? A filter prevents the child from having access to adult material on the web. Many of these parents are outraged at the adults in adult chatrooms when their kids hit the "18 and above" buttom on the website. They blame everyone but themselves for putting the filters on the computers that would PREVENT the child from having access in the first place.
I can cite an incident where a seatbelt killed a 4 year old girl who burned to death when her parents couldn't free herself from the seatbelt.

My point is none of these laws do a single darn positive thing.

A law to require filters would not stop a child from accessing online pornography, just as gun laws do not prevent criminals from accessing guns.

Some laws are bad - and some are just inherently ineffective.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2013, 01:27 AM
 
233 posts, read 238,972 times
Reputation: 140
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
Actually federal law says it is a crime (I looked at all this when we were talking about it). The key is "knowingly". It is common sense that if you allow your kids on the web, without a filter, you are more at fault than anyone. Listen, could understand YEARS ago when these filters were not an option? Sure. That is not the case today.

If you allow your kid on the computer, that kids goes into porn and you do not have the filter to prevent it, you are at fault. You as a parent did not take the steps to ensure your kid was protected...but why blame yourself when you can blame others?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2013, 01:29 AM
 
233 posts, read 238,972 times
Reputation: 140
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
I can cite an incident where a seatbelt killed a 4 year old girl who burned to death when her parents couldn't free herself from the seatbelt.

My point is none of these laws do a single darn positive thing.

A law to require filters would not stop a child from accessing online pornography, just as gun laws do not prevent criminals from accessing guns.
As someone who is for smaller government, I agree with you in the context you are talking about. The whole point I am getting to, is we are living a country where the parents (bad ones), find it easier to blame others. If you kids is accessing adult content, you do not have a filter. If that is the case, YOU as the parent are at fault.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2013, 01:29 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,094 posts, read 26,008,825 times
Reputation: 6128
Quote:
Originally Posted by ropes1981 View Post
Actually federal law says it is a crime (I looked at all this when we were talking about it)
Cite the federal law, please.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:34 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top