Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-16-2013, 11:36 AM
 
10,553 posts, read 9,644,647 times
Reputation: 4784

Advertisements

Despite the fact that many prisoners at Guantanamo have never been prosecuted because there IS no evidence against them, or because they were tortured into confessing, which makes their testimony inadmissable in court, the "small government, fiscally prudent" Republicans in the House voted down an amendment that might have accelerated transfer or release of inmates from Guantanamo.

Currently, the government spends $1.6 million per prisoner per year at Guantanamo, and there are 90 prisoners there. If they were transferred to federal prisons it would cost $34,000 per prisoner, but on Friday June 14th the "small government" Republicans voted to not transfer the inmates to federal prisons on American soil.


G.O.P. Spendthrifts Preserve Government Expansion - NYTimes.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-16-2013, 11:44 AM
 
10,553 posts, read 9,644,647 times
Reputation: 4784
The House Republicans also voted down an amendment to repeal a dangerous provision in the 2013 military budget. That provision authorized military detention for anyone captured in the United States on suspicion of terrorism, and did not explicitly exclude American citizens.


G.O.P. Spendthrifts Preserve Government Expansion - NYTimes.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2013, 11:47 AM
 
Location: In your head, rent free
14,888 posts, read 10,027,960 times
Reputation: 7693
If the POTUS had kept his promise of closing Gitmo 5 years ago this wouldn't be an issue would it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2013, 11:49 AM
 
Location: On the Group W bench
5,563 posts, read 4,260,069 times
Reputation: 2127
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMoreYouKnow View Post
If the POTUS had kept his promise of closing Gitmo 5 years ago this wouldn't be an issue would it?
Wow, that was pretty lame even by C-D standards. Clearly you guys got nuthin'.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2013, 11:50 AM
 
Location: None of your business
5,466 posts, read 4,420,445 times
Reputation: 1179
Quote:
Originally Posted by ellemint View Post
Despite the fact that many prisoners at Guantanamo have never been prosecuted because there IS no evidence against them, or because they were tortured into confessing, which makes their testimony inadmissable in court, the "small government, fiscally prudent" Republicans in the House voted down an amendment that might have accelerated transfer or release of inmates from Guantanamo.

Currently, the government spends $1.6 million per prisoner per year at Guantanamo, and there are 90 prisoners there. If they were transferred to federal prisons it would cost $34,000 per prisoner, but on Friday June 14th the "small government" Republicans voted to not transfer the inmates to federal prisons on American soil.


G.O.P. Spendthrifts Preserve Government Expansion - NYTimes.com
yea, we could put them in Chicago if you like.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2013, 11:51 AM
 
10,553 posts, read 9,644,647 times
Reputation: 4784
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMoreYouKnow View Post
If the POTUS had kept his promise of closing Gitmo 5 years ago this wouldn't be an issue would it?

Doesn't he need the support of Congress in order to do that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2013, 11:51 AM
 
Location: None of your business
5,466 posts, read 4,420,445 times
Reputation: 1179
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMoreYouKnow View Post
If the POTUS had kept his promise of closing Gitmo 5 years ago this wouldn't be an issue would it?
Obama doesn't keep promises. You know that, I know that, his cult members still keep living on "hope and change".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2013, 11:52 AM
 
Location: On the Group W bench
5,563 posts, read 4,260,069 times
Reputation: 2127
Quote:
Originally Posted by eRayP View Post
yea, we could put them in Chicago if you like.
Rightie responses to the venality and hypocrisy of their own kind is getting sadder and sadder every day. This one is just as bad as the one above it.

C'mon guys, doesn't Rush have some new talking points available? Something with at least some semblance to logic and relevance?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2013, 11:54 AM
 
Location: In your head, rent free
14,888 posts, read 10,027,960 times
Reputation: 7693
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmqueen View Post
Wow, that was pretty lame even by C-D standards. Clearly you guys got nuthin'.
I agree with the vote, I don't want any of the guys in GITMO brought to the US and given civilian trials. I just think it's funny as hell that a bunch of morons would blame the Reps for a bill about GITMO 5 years after your messiah failed to keep his promise of closing it down.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2013, 11:55 AM
 
Location: Alaska
7,492 posts, read 5,744,386 times
Reputation: 4875
Quote:
Originally Posted by eRayP View Post
yea, we could put them in Chicago if you like.
Exactly lets bring them all to US soil. We can apologize for treating them badly just for killing innocent people. We can give them a new life as a liberal. Free housing, right to vote, free health care, food stamps. Then they can join the PTA.

How does that sound?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:59 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top