Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The threat no longer existed. They should both be charged.
It's a shame the blood thirsty mongrels in this thread didn't get to see anyone die.
How about the bloodthirsty mongrel who threatened a woman's children? This woman protected herself and children, And now this guy may try to paint himself as the victim because of a "broken home" he grew up in or some none-sense like that. No one made him victimize those people. Responsibility, choices. Choices like she made to protect her kids. Think of having a wife and kids and a guy assaulting them-And come back and tell me what you would have done.
Yes, something else our state allows. You can shoot them as their running out your door and you're still protected under castle doctrine. We don't have a huge home invasion problem here as you can imagine.
Castle doctrine or not, there is noplace in the United States that has a huge home invasion problem.
I think they should release him into your custody....you know, use your home as a 1/2 way house.
LOL!
His "half-life" wouldn't last 5 minutes.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.