Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-06-2013, 05:06 AM
 
Location: North Carolina
1,565 posts, read 2,450,878 times
Reputation: 1647

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by freemkt View Post
Depression is one of the things that motivate people to get fat, which of course causes those other problems. It's hard for someone to lose weight when they're depressed and eating is about the only thing that feels good so that's a hard one to fix.
Depression makes people skinny too. It just depends on the person; however, there is a positive correlation with overweight people and depression. It's both the chicken and the egg, as many of them only become depressed only after becoming overweight. I'm not referring to Major depression disorder.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-06-2013, 05:17 AM
 
Location: North Carolina
1,565 posts, read 2,450,878 times
Reputation: 1647
Quote:
Originally Posted by lycos679 View Post
Good points, but smoking actually results in more people dying at a lower net cost than if those same people lived to be 80. Presumably anyway.
That's actually not correct. Unhealthy people are a far bigger strain on the healthcare system. Just look at countries like japan or France. A healthy person that receives a ton of health care the last 5-10 years of their life is not as big of a problem as a person that's in poor health in their 30's and makes it to 60, particularly if they don't have health insurance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2013, 08:11 AM
 
Location: The land where cats rule
10,908 posts, read 9,554,399 times
Reputation: 3602
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
I wasn't saying that I didn't have a problem.
What happened to Walmart workers is the direct effect of Obamacare.
Yet that was never the original intent was it ?

The intent of Obamacare was to provide insurance to those that didn't have it and help those that couldn't afford it.
Everyone else could keep what they had.

It certainly didn't turn out that way did it ?
It has turned out, and continually evolving even more, as a way of controlling the individual and taking even more money from those that can least afford it.

Continuing to believe what a great deal obamacare is shows a need for the mental health aspect of such a bill.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2013, 08:14 AM
 
Location: The land where cats rule
10,908 posts, read 9,554,399 times
Reputation: 3602
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmking View Post
Obamacare is a mandate to purchase for profit insurance---home run!!

Only for Obama. This "law" makes it even more unaffordable to acquire insurance, witness the rise in premium payments since it inception.

Another lousy "law" from Big Brother.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2013, 08:16 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,472,986 times
Reputation: 27720
Well the House did introduce legislation to restore the traditional full time work definition of 40 hours.

HR-2575 was introduced near the end of June. We'll see if they can get this passed.
I think workers need this..that's 10 hours that p/t workers don't have anymore.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2013, 08:41 AM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,730,963 times
Reputation: 13868
Obamacare incentivizes cuts in workers’ hours

A bill was introduced in the House of Representatives to restore the longstanding definition and restore historical workforce standards. The Save American Workers Act, H.R. 2575, would reinstate the traditional 40-hour-per-week definition to full-time work and remove an incentive to cut hours.

Restore the 40-Hour-Per-Week Definition to Full-Time Work | U.S. Chamber of Commerce
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:15 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top