Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Oh, for Pete's sake...stupid prosecution is trying to say calling a plethora of punks who always get away demonstrates ill will toward, specifically, Trayvon.
I don't usually post in this type of thread but I am curious about something in this case....please excuse me if it's already been discussed:
Zimmerman's Parents were barred from the courtroom supposedly because they were on the witness list. But, TM's Parents were allowed in the courtroom even though they too were witnesses.
Ut Oh...Witness states George's frustrations expressed by fing punks, a--holes does not express ill will, malice or intent....Just George's frustrations about all the "others that got away"
Love the Prosecutor questions so far!!
He didn't say, "this f****** punk always gets away." He said, "these........................."
I don't usually post in this type of thread but I am curious about something in this case....please excuse me if it's already been discussed:
Zimmerman's Parents were barred from the courtroom supposedly because they were on the witness list. But, TM's Parents were allowed in the courtroom even though they too were witnesses.
What gives?
Posted with TapaTalk
Seems biased doesn't it. But so is also not allowing evidence that showed Martin liked to fight
Yes, because it just makes George's story that Martin saw the gun that much less believable. It was concealed inside of his pants, under his jacket in the back he was supposedly laying on.
I don't usually post in this type of thread but I am curious about something in this case....please excuse me if it's already been discussed:
Zimmerman's Parents were barred from the courtroom supposedly because they were on the witness list. But, TM's Parents were allowed in the courtroom even though they too were witnesses.
What gives?
Posted with TapaTalk
Trayvon's parents represent (or speak) for the victim. They are victim advocates, if you will.
I have to say (IMO of course)..the prosecuting attorney isn't winning any points by endlessly repeating the "f_ing punks" and "a_hole" comments, especially when he takes them out of context and changes the tone or inflection of how they were used in the tape. To me at least, he's coming across as an azz. Maybe the jury sees it differently.
Back to the trial, anyone else think this judge is a piece of work? After all the controversial rulings now she just walks off the bench while the defense is talking and recessing as she's hitting the doorway?
Rude is the first thing that comes to mind, biased is the second.
Every judge I've ever seen recesses court before they leave the bench usually allowing the person talking to finish their statement.
Maybe the judge is not happy the State is way behind the ball?
She said that she would rule in the morning at 8:00 because she didn't want to keep them waiting. When she was leaving West started whining about 8:00. That is part of his job, sometimes you go home early and sometimes you do not.
I have to say (IMO of course)..the prosecuting attorney isn't winning any points by endlessly repeating the "f_ing punks" and "a_hole" comments, especially when he takes them out of context and changes the tone or inflection of how they were used in the tape. To me at least, he's coming across as an azz. Maybe the jury sees it differently.
I agree.
It's like they use every opportunity possible to act like punks, themselves.
It's not necessary.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.