Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-11-2013, 07:58 AM
 
1,174 posts, read 2,513,985 times
Reputation: 1414

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by weltschmerz View Post
Nice to know the Hoser State is plowing straight ahead into the 18th century.
I think Indiana's legislature must be particularly inept, but... State's rights. If the people of Indiana don't like it, then the legislature and the law will change.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-11-2013, 08:19 AM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,075,809 times
Reputation: 3954
So was this not a felony under the previous law? The penalty was stiffer under the old one than this new one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-11-2013, 08:51 AM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,862,130 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by bchris02 View Post
Who said all conservatives or even most support Indiana's law? Anybody who respects the Constitution will be against the law banning wedding ceremonies for same sex couples in churches that wish to perform them, even if they are completely against homosexuality or same sex marriage.
Adding to that, a conservative would be against any law permitting marriage as well. Why should a person need governments permission to marry someone they love?

What a farce. I'd be forced to vote for gay marriage in order to allow someone their freedom. Why were those freedoms compromised in the first place? Because big government runs amok and wants to control our lives. Freedom isn't piecemeal, it's for all of the people, all of the time. Always treat the cause and not the symptom.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-11-2013, 09:07 AM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,205,611 times
Reputation: 9895
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
That is just animal abuse. Poor dog.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-11-2013, 10:31 AM
 
Location: Florida
861 posts, read 1,455,913 times
Reputation: 1446
Homosexuality should be a felony.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-11-2013, 10:33 AM
 
4,176 posts, read 4,670,046 times
Reputation: 1672
And with that, this thread should probably be closed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-11-2013, 10:40 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,535,277 times
Reputation: 24780
Default It's now a FELONY in Indiana to apply for a marriage as a same sex couple

Shouldn't surprise anyone who's old enough to have clear memories of the 80s.

All kinds of minor offenses have been rebranded felonies in recent decades. Part of the "law and order" crap politicians used back then to get elected by posing as "tough on crime."

Now, America (the land of liberty) has the world's largest prison population, even though violent crime has been declining steadily. But (again, starting in the 80s) prisons have been "privatized", meaning that more inmates = higher profits (from taxpayer dollars) for the political insiders who get the contracts to run those prisons. Yes, "privatizing" is the nutballs' answer for nearly everything.

When I was a schoolboy back in the 50s and 60s, my teachers would tell us kids that communism is horrible - just look at all those prisoners in Russia and China! Nowadays we can see how crony capitalism is "superior."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2013, 06:25 AM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,862,130 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Gringo View Post
Shouldn't surprise anyone who's old enough to have clear memories of the 80s.

All kinds of minor offenses have been rebranded felonies in recent decades. Part of the "law and order" crap politicians used back then to get elected by posing as "tough on crime."

Now, America (the land of liberty) has the world's largest prison population, even though violent crime has been declining steadily. But (again, starting in the 80s) prisons have been "privatized", meaning that more inmates = higher profits (from taxpayer dollars) for the political insiders who get the contracts to run those prisons. Yes, "privatizing" is the nutballs' answer for nearly everything.

When I was a schoolboy back in the 50s and 60s, my teachers would tell us kids that communism is horrible - just look at all those prisoners in Russia and China! Nowadays we can see how crony capitalism is "superior."
Then quit supporting people like Obama and Romney. If you know something is poison why do you keep eating it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2013, 06:32 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,535,277 times
Reputation: 24780
Default Late to the party...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
Then quit supporting people like Obama and Romney. If you know something is poison why do you keep eating it?

Show me where Obama or Romney either one ran a "law and order" campaign.

You can't.

The damage was done 25 - 30 years ago and now we're living with the craptastic results.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2013, 06:04 PM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,862,130 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Gringo View Post
Show me where Obama or Romney either one ran a "law and order" campaign.

You can't.
I never said they did but why search for the truth when you can make things up and deflect like most of your drama queen posts.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Gringo View Post
The damage was done 25 - 30 years ago and now we're living with the craptastic results.
Obama is currently upholding Federal Marijuana Laws. He's in charge. It's his policy. If he told the Drug Czar, WHO HE APPOINTS, to stop going after marijuana users that person will.
Which President in their right mind appoints someone to a position who has a different policy than the President himself?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:01 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top