Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I think conservatives really dont believe Ob is imperial Tyrant...because if I were he, and an imperial Tyrannt, I would re-write all the laws just to dick with the GOP.
Republicans, you got it good. We treat you better than any other country in the world would. Count you blessings.
Please specify what powers Obama has expanded. Also specify what acts he is doing that campaigned against, and reference the lines in his campaign speeches where he spoke out against them.
Questions like this are proof positive that you are one of the uniformed voters who are responsible for putting a communist in the White House. You should be ashamed for playing a part in the downfall of this once great country.
Questions like this are proof positive that you are one of the uniformed voters who are responsible for putting a communist in the White House. You should be ashamed for playing a part in the downfall of this once great country.
If you want to have an actual debate, make some well read and well articulated points, and we can debate policy all day and see who is more "uniformed". I doubt you want to do that though. These days CD is all about throwing out the caustic one-liners (your post above) or linking a news 2.0 article where the op doesn't even know enough about the subject to actually debate it and cite real sources (like this thread).
1. the DOJ intimidating a FOX news reporter
2. tapping AP phone lines
3. the NSA spying on US citizens
4. using drones to spy on US citizens
5. using drones to kill US citizens
6. using the IRS to punish conservatives
One can argue the merits of tyranny. However, the facts are clear that these events did, in fact occur. Liberals (as the one above) are so far gone that they simply deny the occurrence of these events, thus it is easier for them to rationalize being a liberal and embracing fascism.
Cleaning up conservative lies is more unpleasant that cleaning up my dog's feces.
Obama is an Imperial President...expanding the powers of the president. Even things that Obama has said were illegal for a president to do, he has done. His supporters tend to ignore this as he has a D next to his name. However, Obama's Imperial Presidency is setting a precedent for future presidential actions. A future president will be a conservative. Do you want him or her to have the ability to be just as lawless as Obama with expanded presidential powers?
Evil Obama!
Imperialist! Communist! Fascist! Kenyan!
So, have you heard about this birth certificate rumor?
Some more delusion...courtesy of Obama derangement syndrome.
President Obama is no more an imperial president than any president that preceded him. Ironic that he should be branded with this label considering that the legislation of his party is the most filibustered in the history of the American presidency.
Pretty soon they are going to need a new metric to count the filibusters.
Where to begin...
#1 The filibusters you speak of are phantoms....not happening. Prove it to me and notice that you will cite cloture...cloture simply ends debate. Cloture can be used when there is no filibuster or threat of filibuster. Cloture has even been used when ZERO votes against a bill happened - simply to speed up the process. MSNBC knowingly cites quotes, because this massive number of filibusters is a lie - a lie manufactured to explain Obama's ineptness.
#2 Find another recent president that on multiple occasions says X is illegal for a president to do and then does it. Obama has more power than Bush had. He is per the term an Imperial President.
So, have you heard about this birth certificate rumor?
You are obviously ignorant so you resort to the tactic of slander.
Schlessinger's book in the 70s started the term Imperial President - which is a president that expands the power of the president beyond that of the constitution.
It fit Nixon and it fits Obama.
Take off the dunce cap, use your brain for a change, read the article and then I challenge you to make a thoughtful response to the article - if you can.
You are obviously ignorant so you resort to the tactic of slander.
Schlessinger's book in the 70s started the term Imperial President - which is a president that expands the power of the president beyond that of the constitution.
It fit Nixon and it fits Obama.
Take off the dunce cap, use your brain for a change, read the article and then I challenge you to make a thoughtful response to the article - if you can.
I think you're forgetting one person. This is a good Fox News article.
Obama is an Imperial President...expanding the powers of the president. Even things that Obama has said were illegal for a president to do, he has done. His supporters tend to ignore this as he has a D next to his name. However, Obama's Imperial Presidency is setting a precedent for future presidential actions. A future president will be a conservative. Do you want him or her to have the ability to be just as lawless as Obama with expanded presidential powers?
A few liberal Obama supporters like Naomi Wolf seem to get it (at least a little):
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
