Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
According to Dunn, it was the occupants of the loud music car which started the confrontation.
According to him, he asked them to turn down the music, and they responded with obscenities, threats, and allegedly showed what he thought was a weapon, causing him to fear for his life.
Whether he is telling the truth or full of excrement, Harrier does not know.
The jury will have to decide that question.
You must be picking up bits and pieces from blogs or comments, since that is not what he first stated at all. He said they apologized and turned down the music. He added that Davis then told his friend to turn it back up. Why? Did Dunn say or do something to provoke him? Why are you only questioning what the victim did or did not do instead of the killer? Unfortunately, as in another well publicized case, the victim is not alive to give his version of the story.
You must be joking, right? You need to call the cops even if you are in a car accident and someone is injured. Otherwise you'd be arresting for leaving the scene of an accident.
How does not calling the cops equate to "leaving the scene of a car accident" if one remains on the scene of a car accident?
Have you ever seen a car accident?
Practically everyone in the vicinity is on their cell phones calling 911 once they hear metal crashing into metal.
That is the appropriate thing to do - getting medical personnel on the scene.
Harrier would not use the phone - he would be too busy helping the injured person.
Also, if Harrier is the injured person and he is incapacitated, how is he supposed to use the phone?
Why are you only questioning what the victim did or did not do instead of the killer?
Harrier is not - he is being objective.
He has already said that if it can be proven that there was no reasonable cause for Dunn to feel that his life was in danger, that he was not justified in shooting.
Why do think that anyone who tries to look at both sides of this issue is somehow biased towards Dunn?
How about not blaring music and shouting obscenities and threats at someone who makes a simple request.
If he was unarmed, then there is no justification for firing the weapon.
However, neither you or Harrier know if Davis was unarmed.
That is up to the jury to decide.
Considering that no one except the man being tried for the murder heard these threats, and no gun was ever found, I would say the evidence is on my side here.
Yes it is up to the jury to decide, but I watched the entire trial, and can give my opinion of the case.
You must be picking up bits and pieces from blogs or comments, since that is not what he first stated at all. He said they apologized and turned down the music. He added that Davis then told his friend to turn it back up. Why? Did Dunn say or do something to provoke him? Why are you only questioning what the victim did or did not do instead of the killer? Unfortunately, as in another well publicized case, the victim is not alive to give his version of the story.
And the killer has given MANY different versions of his story. His testimony has be contradicted by phone records, other witnesses, his fiancee, and his own recorded interviews.
Considering that no one except the man being tried for the murder heard these threats, and no gun was ever found, I would say the evidence is on my side here.
Yes it is up to the jury to decide, but I watched the entire trial, and can give my opinion of the case.
You didn't see nor hear everything that the jury did.
When will this epidemic of white-on-black crime come to an end?
WHAT EPIDEMIC? ninety percent of battery crime is black on black, white on black is very low like 4%. what is it with black and crime period, why can't the black population just behave, not get gangster on everything. black 17 % of population but over 60% of all crimes
Why can't some White Males get over the fact that slavery is over and they can no longer kill Black People without justification???...when will some White Males grow a pair of balls if they are so tough and tell rude people "come on let's handle this man to man??...why are some White Males total cowards until they possess a hand gun or rifle???
Why can't some White People stop being so utterly stupid and making claims that Black people are one monolithic group that acts "gangster?"
Why are some White People so utterly racist that they have numerous web sites stating the same ignorant garbage as you??
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
