Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-24-2013, 01:09 PM
 
3,537 posts, read 2,735,079 times
Reputation: 1034

Advertisements

DETROIT (AP) — General Motors stock would have to sell for $95.51 per share for taxpayers to break even on bailing out the company, according to a government watchdog's report released Wednesday.
That price is about three times what GM shares are selling for now, even after a 25 percent increase in the price so far this year....

Taxpayers are still $18.1 billion in the hole on the $49.5 billion bailout, including interest and dividends, according to the report.
If the government sells its remaining shares of GM for the current stock price of $36.61, it would get just over $6.9 billion, meaning taxpayers would lose about $11.2 billion on the bailout.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/govt-n...051827610.html


Corporate taxpayer bailouts must cease. GM is not a viable company. why do we insist on pouring money into failures?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-24-2013, 01:10 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
12,287 posts, read 9,819,598 times
Reputation: 6509
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoomBen View Post
DETROIT (AP) — General Motors stock would have to sell for $95.51 per share for taxpayers to break even on bailing out the company, according to a government watchdog's report released Wednesday.
That price is about three times what GM shares are selling for now, even after a 25 percent increase in the price so far this year.

Corporate taxpayer bailouts must cease. GM is not a viable company.
I agree. Let GM fail, another car company will fill the void. The government should not be picking winners and losers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2013, 01:11 PM
 
3,537 posts, read 2,735,079 times
Reputation: 1034
Quote:
Originally Posted by shooting4life View Post
I agree. Let GM fail, another car company will fill the void.
I just hope a lesson is learned.
We can never bailout a failed company again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2013, 01:25 PM
 
13,900 posts, read 9,768,836 times
Reputation: 6856
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoomBen View Post
DETROIT (AP) — General Motors stock would have to sell for $95.51 per share for taxpayers to break even on bailing out the company, according to a government watchdog's report released Wednesday.
That price is about three times what GM shares are selling for now, even after a 25 percent increase in the price so far this year....

Taxpayers are still $18.1 billion in the hole on the $49.5 billion bailout, including interest and dividends, according to the report.
If the government sells its remaining shares of GM for the current stock price of $36.61, it would get just over $6.9 billion, meaning taxpayers would lose about $11.2 billion on the bailout.

Gov't needs $95.51 per share to break even on GM - Yahoo! Finance


Corporate taxpayer bailouts must cease. GM is not a viable company. why do we insist on pouring money into failures?
Saving two large auto manufacturers and about 1.5 millions jobs was a failure?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2013, 01:36 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
12,287 posts, read 9,819,598 times
Reputation: 6509
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks View Post
Saving two large auto manufacturers and about 1.5 millions jobs was a failure?
It was a failure. The government has no business keeping a privately help company afloat. They should have declared bankruptcy and restructured.

Should the government just give money to any business that is losing money so they don't have to pay people off?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2013, 03:04 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,074,302 times
Reputation: 3954
The idea that governments have no role in keeping core industries afloat is too stupid for words.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2013, 03:05 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
12,287 posts, read 9,819,598 times
Reputation: 6509
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
The idea that governments have no role in keeping core industries afloat is too stupid for words.
I'm sure ford would have appreciated the government staying out of "core industries"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2013, 03:09 PM
 
Location: Tyler, TX
23,864 posts, read 24,105,148 times
Reputation: 15135
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks View Post
Saving two large auto manufacturers and about 1.5 millions jobs was a failure?
Do you actually believe that the factories would have gone dark, and all 1.5m employees would have been out of work?

Do you ACTUALLY believe that???

Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
too stupid for words.
You said it, HD.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2013, 03:11 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,074,302 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by shooting4life View Post
I'm sure ford would have appreciated the government staying out of "core industries"
You would be wrong.

The company’s CEO lobbied for the TARP, as Ford feared that a collapse of GM and Chrysler at the time would have hurt suppliers and, in turn, Ford itself. Ford Chief Executive Officer Alan R. Mulally also asked Congress for a “credit line” of up to $9 billion in case the economy worsened. In other words, Ford was for the government bailout of GM and Chrysler.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2013, 03:12 PM
 
14,292 posts, read 9,676,201 times
Reputation: 4254
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoomBen View Post
DETROIT (AP) — General Motors stock would have to sell for $95.51 per share for taxpayers to break even on bailing out the company, according to a government watchdog's report released Wednesday.
That price is about three times what GM shares are selling for now, even after a 25 percent increase in the price so far this year....

Taxpayers are still $18.1 billion in the hole on the $49.5 billion bailout, including interest and dividends, according to the report.
If the government sells its remaining shares of GM for the current stock price of $36.61, it would get just over $6.9 billion, meaning taxpayers would lose about $11.2 billion on the bailout.

Gov't needs $95.51 per share to break even on GM - Yahoo! Finance


Corporate taxpayer bailouts must cease. GM is not a viable company. why do we insist on pouring money into failures?
which is ironic, since because of the bailout proceeding, they are not even paying any income taxes right now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:51 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top