Should FL be boycotted? (generations, Sacramento, school, vote)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
i kno rite
she's not very smart, she was better off following him, stalking him and killing him, that way she would be free
she would have credible defense too, since the dude put her in the hospital before
That scenario would only work if he assaulted her for following him, like Martin did to Zimmerman.
I agree that the "Stand Your Ground" law has some major flaws
What flaws? You've obviously read and contemplated it, or you wouldn't have made that statement, right?
So where are the flaws?
"A person who is not engaged in an unlawful activity and who is attacked in any other place where he or she has a right to be has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony."
That scenario would only work if he assaulted her for following him, like Martin did to Zimmerman.
of course he would or at least she could say he did, and they would believe her (if she was a white girl, of course), whether she lied or not, wouldnt matter, esp with his prior assault history on her, since in FL u dont need any witnesses...
im not gon get it into other states laws' cuz this is off topic
Hardly!
You're advocating boycotting Florida, because it has a certain type of law on the books. Bringing up your failure to address the fact that numerous other states have similar laws, and that you're not calling for the boycott of those states, is most certainly not off topic.
You're advocating boycotting Florida, because it has a certain type of law on the books. Bringing up your failure to address the fact that numerous other states have similar laws, and that you're not calling for the boycott of those states, is most certainly not off topic.
Especially since Washington is a liberal state - they are the exception to Harrier's rule above.
Washington even still has an active gallows which they have used twice in the last 21 years.
it leaves too much murkiness, anyone can feel threatened by anyth and this law encourages you to do someth u might have not done otherwise jus cuz u have a weapon plus u dont have to try to evade conflict or get away from trouble, which is dumb, this is not wild west
i cited all articles b4, enjoy the reads
English only on the forum, Stechkin, per the ToS.
Let me know when you're able to actually comprehend the text of the law in question. That day is clearly not today.
I won't be wasting any more time with you. Have a good evening.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
analysis.
