Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Who cares what the weird woman names here kid.... I do think people ought to think of the name they hang on their child, like the boy named "Sue." Guess next people will be naming their kid god.
Who cares what the weird woman names here kid.... I do think people ought to think of the name they hang on their child, like the boy named "Sue." Guess next people will be naming their kid god.
Lol. That was tried. Grace Slick, she wanted to do that. That she is more than half a bubble off of plumb has never been disputed, even by her.
I feel sorry for any Hispanic kids named Jesus who come in front of this "judge".
This is just typical liberal anti-Christian garbage. Then they will come long later and feign puzzlement over how Christians could feel attacked in this country.
The judge did not force them to change the name because of her religious beliefs, and stated as much in her interview. She stated flat out that she felt the child's name would cause problems for the child growing up. Now I disagree with what the judge ordered and I feel she should have no authority to do it, but to paint her as a Christian zealot trying to stamp out blasphemy is just liberal misrepresentation and deception. But liberals making up motivations for why conservatives do what they do is nothing new.
Reminds me of the firestorm of righteous indignation from the left over Justice Scalia's comments on the voting rights act.
This is just typical liberal anti-Christian garbage. Then they will come long later and feign puzzlement over how Christians could feel attacked in this country.
The judge did not force them to change the name because of her religious beliefs, and stated as much in her interview. She stated flat out that she felt the child's name would cause problems for the child growing up. Now I disagree with what the judge ordered and I feel she should have no authority to do it, but to paint her as a Christian zealot trying to stamp out blasphemy is just liberal misrepresentation and deception. But liberals making up motivations for why conservatives do what they do is nothing new.
Reminds me of the firestorm of righteous indignation from the left over Justice Scalia's comments on the voting rights act.
The judge also stated: "The word Messiah is a title, and it's a title that has only been earned by one person, and that one person is Jesus Christ,". I'm not sure how that is not because of her religious beliefs. How can she possibly know that name will cause the child problems later in life. Did she get a crystal ball with that robe?
Judge Changes Infant's name From Messiah to Martin
"NEWPORT, Tenn. (AP) -- A judge in Tennessee changed a 7-month-old boy's name to Martin from Messiah, saying the religious name was earned by one person and "that one person is Jesus Christ."
"The judge in eastern Tennessee said the baby was to be named Martin DeShawn McCullough, which includes both parents' last name.
The boy's mother, Jaleesa Martin, of Newport, said she will appeal. She says Messiah is unique and she liked how it sounded alongside the boy's two siblings -- Micah and Mason.
"Everybody believes what they want so I think I should be able to name my child what I want to name him, not someone else," Martin said."
"Messiah was No. 4 among the fastest-rising baby names in 2012, according to the Social Security Administration's annual list of popular baby names."
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.