Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Well I've not seen one argument by the left as to why this ban on plastic bags is in place or why it is necessary. Their leaders imposed it and that is that according to them apparently. Nothing but deflections and insults by the liberal posters up and down this thread............like usual.
"The legislation, meant to reduce litter and waste-processing costs, requires all retail outlets top stop distributing single-use plastic bags in October.
...
"These bags end up as litter on our streets, as trash on our bay [and are] a costly nuisance in our waste processing system," said Christina Olague, a member of the Board of Supervisors."
Well I've not seen one argument by the left as to why this ban on plastic bags is in place or why it is necessary. Their leaders imposed it and that is that according to them apparently. Nothing but deflections and insults by the liberal posters up and down this thread............like usual.
I thought this thread was about the ban on plastic bags killing 5.5 people as researched by LAW professors.
No KU, it's about fake poutrage by the right, as usual.
For the third time in this thread: San Francisco has a goal of zero landfill waste by 2020. This ban on plastic bags is a part of that.
What % of the landfill is composed of plastic bags? I'd bet heroin needles, old drag queen costumes and granola wrappers make up a higher percent. Is all that banned too?
We are discussing plastic bag bans and their consequences.
Do you think that the bans are a good idea?
Harrier has presented one very good reason why are not.
Tell us what you think and explain why, please.
I can't figure out what's worse. Your non-stop caveman views, your blanket statements that blame all things on liberal's, or your speaking in the 3rd person. Seek therapy. Seriously.
I can't figure out what's worse. Your non-stop caveman views, your blanket statements that blame all things on liberal's, or your speaking in the 3rd person. Seek therapy. Seriously.
Harrier can't figure out what is worse: your seemingly inability to contribute relevantly to the thread, your obsession with Harrier's manner of referencing himself, or your inability to comprehend the TOS, a portion of which Harrier provides below for your edification, since you blatantly violated the rule against personal attacks by posting the bolded.
*****Negative remarks about a person's physical or psychiatric health, e.g. accusing a member of senility; needing/forgetting psychiatric medications; making psychiatric diagnosis such as paranoid, bi-polar and the like; suggesting a member needs psychiatric help.
Harrier can't figure out what is worse: your seemingly inability to contribute relevantly to the thread, your obsession with Harrier's manner of referencing himself, or your inability to comprehend the TOS, a portion of which Harrier provides below your edification, since you blatantly violated the rule against personal attacks by posting the bolded.
I've provided facts in previous arguments, you choose to ignore them. Then you cry about it when you get called out for your lunacy. There is no point in trying to engage in a debate with you, it's like arguing with a child. I knew as soon as I posted in this thread you'd go running to the moderators for help.
I also think it's humerous that you have nearly 20K posts, yet your rep is less than 5K. Just goes to show, even people on the far right rarely agree with you.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.