Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-15-2013, 07:34 AM
 
Location: On the Group W bench
5,563 posts, read 4,260,400 times
Reputation: 2127

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerseyt719 View Post
Ok. This post wins for most hypocritical.

We are nearly 5 years into this presidency and nothing is O's fault. Yet you blame Bush for something that happened 9 months after he takes office. Yup. His complete fault. Because it took those terrorists all of only nine months to plan and train for that monumentous exercise in terror.
The (obvious) point is that Bush was TOLD something bad was coming and he ignored it to go on a 5-week vacation. When the terrorists began planning it is irrelevant, of course.

And speaking of which, who the hell takes a 5-week vacation only a few months after starting a new job? Golly gee, it's that hard-workin', pulled-himself-up-by-his-bootstraps Georgie Boy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-15-2013, 07:36 AM
 
Location: Too far from home.
8,732 posts, read 6,779,319 times
Reputation: 2374
Quote:
Originally Posted by RD5050 View Post
At least Obama spends his time at The White House, where he is available to meet with other government officals, etc.

Meanwhile Bush hid out on his private property 1500 miles away from Washington DC.

Bush was able to avoid dealing with the news media and any government officials wanting to meet with him.

Let's face it ... he was "on vacation".

His Crawford time was his to use any way he wanted. Nobody to bother him. He was on his own private property.

And he had no reason to work if he didn't feel like it.

He could fish at his personal 11 acre lake that he had built at Crawford, and stocked with more than 600 fish.

He could swim in the pool he had built there.

He could go mountain biking at his ranch, which was so big you could fit 10 Disneylands inside the property lines!

He could do all of these fun things while he was sending thousands of soldiers to fight in the wars he started!

You show one single photo of Bush conducting a meeting in Crawford, and according to you, that should fully explain Bush's entire 490 days at Crawford?
How about you prove Bush "hid out" while he was in Crawford? Kibby already posted a list of the people who are known to have visited him. Do you think all those diplomats were there for a fishing trip??

How about you show ONE photo of Obama conducting a meeting while vacationing in Hawaii? How about Martha's Vineyard - you have an album of him meeting people?? FFS he didn't even stick his head out to comment on the civil unrest in Egypt, but sent some talking head out to say "we condemn the violence", but when Morsi was ousted he was hunkered down in the situation room talking to Kerry about the situation - via phone because Kerry was on vacation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-15-2013, 07:37 AM
 
20,187 posts, read 23,844,914 times
Reputation: 9283
95 vacations/1 term

1 term = 4 years

Obama has roughly 24 days of vacation

That means he has about 3 weeks of vacation per year. That seems actually reasonable... are we sure about the "94" days because it seems longer than that but I may be wrong... is this excluding holidays?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-15-2013, 07:39 AM
 
Location: On the Group W bench
5,563 posts, read 4,260,400 times
Reputation: 2127
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMoreYouKnow View Post
My issue is with people who are too stupid and dishonest to acknowledge that every day that President Bush spent in Crawford wasn't a "vacation day". If you apply the same criteria to both Presidents Obama and Bush are about the same when it comes to true vacation days.
I'm deeply interested in how you know exactly what President Bush was doing, every minute, for those 320 days. You've made this assertion more than once so clearly you've been able to actually do a minute-by-minute comparison.

Or perhaps ... oh, I don't know... maybe ... you're just making it up?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-15-2013, 07:42 AM
 
Location: On the Group W bench
5,563 posts, read 4,260,400 times
Reputation: 2127
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willsson View Post

Rather than question what the media calls a vacation, the press should be asking where Obama was the overnight of September 11, 2012, when four Americans were slain in Benghazi.
Very curious to know what kind of warnings Obama had about Benghazi. You know, like the entire nine months of warnings that Bush received about an imminent attack.

Makes a teensy bit of difference, no? Unless, of course, your position is that Pres. Obama should be consulting a crystal ball every time he thinks about stepping outside the Oval Office.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-15-2013, 07:49 AM
 
Location: San Diego
5,319 posts, read 8,981,479 times
Reputation: 3396
Quote:
Originally Posted by softblueyz View Post
How about you prove Bush "hid out" while he was in Crawford? Kibby already posted a list of the people who are known to have visited him. Do you think all those diplomats were there for a fishing trip??

How about you show ONE photo of Obama conducting a meeting while vacationing in Hawaii? How about Martha's Vineyard - you have an album of him meeting people?? FFS he didn't even stick his head out to comment on the civil unrest in Egypt, but sent some talking head out to say "we condemn the violence", but when Morsi was ousted he was hunkered down in the situation room talking to Kerry about the situation - via phone because Kerry was on vacation.
There is nothing to prove.

Bush was on his own private property, which means invited guests only.

Bush was free to do as he pleased.

He could spend an hour holding a meeting, and then go fishing on his private lake the rest of the day.

There would be no uninvited press or other government officials there to see what he was doing.

And there were only 15 reported visits by foreign diplomats.

So how does Bush account for the other 475 days?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-15-2013, 07:54 AM
 
11,768 posts, read 10,257,576 times
Reputation: 3444
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmqueen View Post
Got stats on that to prove it?
It's not exactly news. 2 republicans and 8 democrats make up the wealthiest Congressional members.

The 50 Richest Members of Congress -- 112th (2012) : Roll Call

Top ten:

Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas)
Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass)
Rep. Darrel Issa (R-Calif)
Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va)
Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va)
Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn)
Rep. Jared Polis (D-Colo)
Sen. Frank Lautenburg (D-NJ)
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif)
Rep. Jim Renacci (R-Ohio)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-15-2013, 07:56 AM
 
Location: Fort Myers Fl
2,305 posts, read 3,027,839 times
Reputation: 921
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
Seeing as how they were/are both terrible, the conclusion we can draw is that Obama works harder at it.

The rest of you minions can keep fighting over my party is better than yours but this is the truth right here.

When are you sheep ever going to realize both parties SUCK.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-15-2013, 07:59 AM
 
Location: Too far from home.
8,732 posts, read 6,779,319 times
Reputation: 2374
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjski View Post
Assumes facts not in evidence...
Thank you Judge Judy.

Looked at your history.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-15-2013, 08:00 AM
 
Location: 500 miles from home
33,942 posts, read 22,512,088 times
Reputation: 25816
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimRom View Post
No, the Obama supporters are playing the "Bush did this, so it's okay if Obama does this" game. As Kibby pointed out earlier in the thread, the entire premise in an insult to Obama.
Pointing out obvious hypocrisy is a valid argument. Were you outraged when Bush spent the majority of time at his 'ranch'?

????

Or is this a newly discovered insult to your delicate sensibilities?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:22 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top