Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-13-2013, 01:00 PM
 
4,176 posts, read 4,670,550 times
Reputation: 1672

Advertisements

You troll the forum with a conservative survey and then pretend to get mad when people shoot holes thru it. What's the problem again?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-13-2013, 01:01 PM
 
13,900 posts, read 9,771,097 times
Reputation: 6856
Quote:
Originally Posted by KUchief25 View Post
Your graphs of phantom climate scientists? LOL

I can pull up excel and make one prettier than that to boot.
You linked one "peer reviewed" article that surveyed the usual fossil fuel shills. The author of the article is a business professor.

Since the one article is peer reviewed and somehow that now is enough to convince you of something, I'm guessing you now accept the hundreds of actual peer reviewed articles from actual climate scientists that claim humans burning fossil fuels contributes to climate change?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-13-2013, 01:02 PM
 
Location: Calgary, AB
3,401 posts, read 2,285,021 times
Reputation: 1072
Although, being an Albertan engineer, I'm flattered that the denialists have suddenly decided I possess some expertise in the matter.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-13-2013, 01:02 PM
 
13,900 posts, read 9,771,097 times
Reputation: 6856
Quote:
Originally Posted by Globe199 View Post
You troll the forum with a conservative survey and then pretend to get mad when people shoot holes thru it. What's the problem again?
His problem is reality.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-13-2013, 01:04 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,005,733 times
Reputation: 5455
Quote:
Originally Posted by Globe199 View Post
You troll the forum with a conservative survey and then pretend to get mad when people shoot holes thru it. What's the problem again?
I've seen nothing but a pointless graph flashed for all to see and incessant squealing about this peer reviewed study that is now a "conservative" one according to you. No holes anywhere other than in your global warming myths and lies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-13-2013, 01:08 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,005,733 times
Reputation: 5455
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks View Post
You linked one "peer reviewed" article that surveyed the usual fossil fuel shills. The author of the article is a business professor.

Since the one article is peer reviewed and somehow that now is enough to convince you of something, I'm guessing you now accept the hundreds of actual peer reviewed articles from actual climate scientists that claim humans burning fossil fuels contributes to climate change?
I've always accepted them. They aren't true and are full of lies and have been proven as such but I accept them as peer reviewed research. When the reviewers are lying you have to take that into account though. Perhaps you can show some lies by these folks in the paper?? I'm betting none of you so called experts have even read it to begin with. Just jump in graph splashing and screaming.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-13-2013, 01:08 PM
 
4,176 posts, read 4,670,550 times
Reputation: 1672
The tobacco "scientists" at Philip Morris did the same thing when they released their "study" saying that tobacco isn't all that dangerous. If you can't see why people would be skeptical about what is essentially an industry study, then there's nothing left to discuss.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-13-2013, 01:09 PM
 
1,519 posts, read 1,227,733 times
Reputation: 898
We had this "study" in a thread here months ago - where it was debunked as severely biased because of the sample they used.

It's like asking Monsanto employees if they believe genetically modified food could cause problems.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-13-2013, 01:09 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,005,733 times
Reputation: 5455
What exactly is a tobacco scientist? Are they on par with climate scientists? I think so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-13-2013, 01:10 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,005,733 times
Reputation: 5455
Debunked by you folks? LOL
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:20 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top