Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If I could, I would rep this post ten times. This, in a nutshell, is the real St. Ronnie, especially the parts in bold, as opposed to the revisionist history as told by the right. Very well stated.
Again I didn't start this thread to argue policy decisions by either president. If you want to go into debt spending there are many threads on that.
Again I didn't start this thread to argue policy decisions by either president. If you want to go into debt spending there are many threads on that.
LOL. You start a thread titled Reagan vs Obama but we're not allowed to talk about Reagan? What you really mean is, you started this thread to bash Obama (a past time of yours) and will allow no talk that disproves your OP. Here's an idea--don't start a thread comparing Reagan to Obama if you don't want people to actaully compare Reagan to Obama.
Status:
"everybody getting reported now.."
(set 23 days ago)
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,551 posts, read 16,542,682 times
Reputation: 6040
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman
It's 52.8 and 49 according to Wiki.
I rounded 2/10 of one percent, shoot me.
I'm not making any argument, I'm poking a stick in your eye.
And despite that Reagan has one the largest margins of victory in history in his seconds election and Obama loses votes. Again that's becsue Reagan was Reagan.
LOL. You start a thread titled Reagan vs Obama but we're not allowed to talk about Reagan? What you really mean is, you started this thread to bash Obama (a past time of yours) and will allow no talk that disproves your OP. Here's an idea--don't start a thread comparing Reagan to Obama if you don't want people to actaully compare Reagan to Obama.
Do you really want to compare Reagans deficits vs Obamas?
Obama only wishes he could be on the same level as Regean. Never going to happen though, the Democrats will need to change their whole party before that would happen.
Obamacare hasn't been implemented yet so I don't know how your little story has any relevance other than to show that things were just fine the way they were.
The portion of Obamacare requiring that people with pre-existing conditions be allowed to purchase insurance has already gone into affect. I have a pre-existing condition (asthma, even though I haven't had an asthma attack in over 16 years) so on the open market, prior to Obamacare, I could not have bought any insurance myself. Luckily, my employers covered me, but some employers, before Obamacare went into affect, would not cover specific pre-existing conditions like leukemia, of which the previous poster spoke of.
Quote:
Originally Posted by KUchief25
I base my statement off his actions and speak.
So you base your views on pictures that may have been photoshopped....
Come on now!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
