Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-04-2013, 08:03 AM
 
24,404 posts, read 23,061,247 times
Reputation: 15013

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by softblueyz View Post
Sadly, the 300,000 American Syrians are now being scrutinized by government. The government thinks that there may be some Assad supporters who might want to retaliate. Sure, that's why they fled Syria under Daddy and Junior Assad and are living in the US.
>>>>> And there are another 300,000,000 Americans also being scrutinized by the government as potential terrorists with no ties to anybody.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-04-2013, 11:23 AM
 
Location: North Texas
24,561 posts, read 40,281,740 times
Reputation: 28564
Quote:
Originally Posted by trlhiker View Post
And if she commented, you would be all over her for opening her mouth. You cons are so predictable.

By the way, she is no longer secretary of state, so why should she comment.

For the record, why hasn't Boner, McConnell, or Romney commented on it?
Pretty much, yup.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2013, 01:09 PM
 
2,040 posts, read 2,458,964 times
Reputation: 1067
Quote:
Originally Posted by trlhiker View Post
And if she commented, you would be all over her for opening her mouth. You cons are so predictable.

By the way, she is no longer secretary of state, so why should she comment.
Then why did she comment about government transparency? Why is she planning on doing a whole series of speeches about it?

The left heralded that speech as her glorious kickoff to her presidential campaign.

There was no reason for her to talk about that either was there?

http://redalertpolitics.com/2013/08/...in-government/

Posted with TapaTalk
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2013, 01:11 PM
 
13,900 posts, read 9,769,934 times
Reputation: 6856
Quote:
Originally Posted by malamute View Post
Some big-mouthed presidential candidate seems to be mysteriously quiet. Of course our lapdog media won't notice her silence --- but there are those out there that have noticed.

Why a nervous Hillary Clinton is remarkably silent on Syria – Telegraph Blogs

I suspect a number of factors are behind Hillary Clinton’s reticence. Firstly, a US military intervention in the Syrian civil war is strongly opposed by the vast majority of the American public. A recent poll showed just nine percent of Americans backing US military involvement. She probably doesn’t see another war in the Muslim world as a vote winner in 2016. Secondly, she may well be harbouring doubts over the White House approach, which beyond the talk of airstrikes, lacks a coherent strategy, and the president hasn’t exactly made a clear-cut case that taking America to war in Syria is in the national interest. Thirdly, as “the Obama doctrine†goes down in flames in the Middle East, from Damascus to Cairo, Clinton will be nervous about being seen as part and parcel of it, which of course she is.

Fourthly, Clinton’s own track record on Syria has hardly been stellar. Before Syria descended into war, Clinton was a strong backer of engagement with Syria, greatly underestimating the nature of the Baathist regime, famously referring to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad as a “reformer†in April 2011. In addition, as Washington’s most senior foreign policy official, Clinton did little to stand up to Moscow’s aggressive support for the Syrians, eager to appease the Russians through the controversial “reset†strategy, which was her own brainchild. In addition, the Secretary of State was weak in the face of Iran, whose military and financial backing for the Assad regime has been vital to its survival.

Against this backdrop it’s not hard to see why Hillary Clinton isn’t at the forefront of the Syria debate. Her own handling of the Syria crisis was a spectacular failure, as has been President Obama's.
Hillary Clinton Backs Syria Strikes, President Obama - ABC News
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2013, 01:17 PM
 
2,040 posts, read 2,458,964 times
Reputation: 1067
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks View Post
So that's it huh?:

Quote:
"Secretary Clinton supports the president's effort to enlist the Congress in pursuing a strong and targeted response to the Assad regime's horrific use of chemical weapons," a Clinton aide told ABC News.
An aide announces that she's all for asking Congress... that's it.

She doesn't say if she backs attacking Syria or not....only that she backs asking Congress.

That's fence sitting at it's best!

Posted with TapaTalk
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2013, 01:22 PM
 
13,900 posts, read 9,769,934 times
Reputation: 6856
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bludy-L View Post
So that's it huh?:



An aide announces that she's all for asking Congress... that's it.

She doesn't say if she backs attacking Syria or not....only that she backs asking Congress.

That's fence sitting at it's best!

Posted with TapaTalk
What part of her supporting a strong and targeted attack is so tough for you to comprehend?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2013, 01:26 PM
 
2,040 posts, read 2,458,964 times
Reputation: 1067
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks View Post
What part of her supporting a strong and targeted attack is so tough for you to comprehend?
Lmao....check your reading skills.

She only says she backs Obama asking Congress for a strong and targeted attack. It doesn't say that's what SHE backs doing.

It is deliberately worded so she can nuance her way out of taking any responsibility for the outcome either way.

Posted with TapaTalk
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2013, 01:28 PM
 
10,092 posts, read 8,204,237 times
Reputation: 3411
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bludy-L View Post
Then why did she comment about government transparency? Why is she planning on doing a whole series of speeches about it?

The left heralded that speech as her glorious kickoff to her presidential campaign.

There was no reason for her to talk about that either was there?

Hillary Clinton to deliver series of speeches promoting transparency, addressing Americans’ faith in government

Posted with TapaTalk
Hillary would be incredibly dumb to kick off her campaign this early, and she hasn't. You can say a lot of things about her, but no one can call her dumb. Right now she's citizen Hillary Clinton, so why would she say much of anything?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2013, 01:28 PM
 
519 posts, read 1,023,680 times
Reputation: 929
She's so silent that you would almost think she retired from the State Department.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2013, 01:34 PM
 
2,040 posts, read 2,458,964 times
Reputation: 1067
Quote:
Originally Posted by mb1547 View Post
Hillary would be incredibly dumb to kick off her campaign this early, and she hasn't. You can say a lot of things about her, but no one can call her dumb. Right now she's citizen Hillary Clinton, so why would she say much of anything?
Oh....I would call her dumb!

I wasn't the one saying her speeches on government transparency were her campaign kickoff.....it was "progressives" here on C-D.

If she's a private citizen now, why is she bothering with these speeches?

Dumb fits her well.

Posted with TapaTalk
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:25 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top