Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-20-2013, 07:06 AM
 
Location: Jacksonville, FL
11,143 posts, read 10,706,529 times
Reputation: 9799

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by KaaBoom View Post
BS misinformation. Without freedom of movement, your Second Amendment would be worthless. You wouldn't even be able to get ammunition for your guns, if you can't move freely on public roads. It is amazing how you people have been brainwashed to believe that everything is a "privilege" granted by the government, except gun ownership. The government is laughing at you. They are letting you play with your little toys, while they are taking all of your other rights away.


"The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horse-drawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but a common right which he has under his right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." Thompson v.Smith, 154 SE 579, 11 American Jurisprudence, Constitutional Law, section 329, page 1135

U.S. SUPREME COURT SAYS THAT DRIVING IS A RIGHT, NOT A PRIVILEGE
The "proof" that you posted is no such thing. The court decision you are citing has to do with whether or not an individual needs to be licensed in order to operate a motor vehicle. It has absolutely nothing to do with the right to own a motor vehicle, which is the center of the argument. Show me a court decision which states that an individual has the right to own a motor vehicle.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-20-2013, 08:27 AM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
12,287 posts, read 9,818,580 times
Reputation: 6509
Quote:
Originally Posted by KaaBoom View Post
Lets see you try walking to the nearest munitions factory, to buy your ammo, when the government decides to revoke your "privilege" of driving.
See we have this thing called the Internet, it allows you to buy things from people around the nation and have that item shipped directly to your house.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2013, 09:52 AM
 
Location: Ohio
13,933 posts, read 12,892,311 times
Reputation: 7399
Quote:
Originally Posted by KaaBoom View Post
Lets see you try walking to the nearest munitions factory, to buy your ammo, when the government decides to revoke your "privilege" of driving.
There's one right in my town, so shouldn't be much of a problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2013, 01:18 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,094 posts, read 26,000,767 times
Reputation: 6128
What is a gunnut?

Harrier likes pecans, almonds, cashews, and walnuts.

How can Harrier own a gunnut?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2013, 01:26 PM
 
Location: Coos Bay, Oregon
7,138 posts, read 11,025,121 times
Reputation: 7808
Here we go again. More gun maniacs who think it's a cool idea to give loaded firearms to kids.

NORTH HARRIS COUNTY, Texas -- A 17-year-old boy is facing a serious charge after allegedly lying about the accidental shooting of his 16-year-old sister.

The boy reportedly told deputies that he brought the gun home after getting it from a family member. It’s unclear which relative the .45 caliber might’ve come from.


HCSO: Brother charged after lying about accidental shooting of 16-year-old sister | khou.com Houston
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2013, 01:42 PM
 
Location: Billings, MT
9,885 posts, read 10,969,651 times
Reputation: 14180
"Here we go again. More gun maniacs who think it's a cool idea to give loaded firearms to kids."

Just like any other dangerous activity, with proper education and training, it is not a problem.
As with ANY dangerous activity (walking, riding a tricycle or bicycle, riding a motorcycle, driving a vehicle, etc), if the person, regardless of age, is not properly trained and educated, tragedies can happen.
Many of us got our first gun when we were 12 years old (that is the age, in this state, at which one can get a hunting license, IF one has passed a Hunter Safety Course). Most of us have never injured or killed anybody since then.
Sorry, but even if you can find 100 such examples, that number would be meaningless alongside the number of well trained, responsible gun owners and users in the country!
There are many things in this world which injure or kill many more children than guns do. How often have you ranted against them?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2013, 01:44 PM
 
Location: Coos Bay, Oregon
7,138 posts, read 11,025,121 times
Reputation: 7808
And gunnuts love to lie. They could care less that their six year old son just put a bullet in his four year old sister's face. All they care about is getting the six year old to lie about it, so they don't lose their gunz.

A Wisconsin dad is under fire for allegedly telling his 6-year-old son to lie about shooting his 4-year-old sister in the face.

Officials said the boy initially told investigators he picked up the shotgun and then dropped it, at which point it fired and hit his sister.

He later admitted that his dad told him to lie about how the gun discharged. His revised story was that his sister asked him to point the gun at her. The accident happened when he aimed it too close to her ear while trying to aim past her shoulder.

The boy's mother told investigators that her son had been trained to use firearms since he was 3 and even had his own .22 caliber rifle that he was allowed to shoot with adult supervision,
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2013, 01:58 PM
 
14,993 posts, read 23,881,675 times
Reputation: 26523
Quote:
Originally Posted by KaaBoom View Post
And gunnuts love to lie. They could care less that their six year old son just put a bullet in his four year old sister's face. All they care about is getting the six year old to lie about it, so they don't lose their gunz.

A Wisconsin dad is under fire for allegedly telling his 6-year-old son to lie about shooting his 4-year-old sister in the face.

Officials said the boy initially told investigators he picked up the shotgun and then dropped it, at which point it fired and hit his sister.

He later admitted that his dad told him to lie about how the gun discharged. His revised story was that his sister asked him to point the gun at her. The accident happened when he aimed it too close to her ear while trying to aim past her shoulder.

The boy's mother told investigators that her son had been trained to use firearms since he was 3 and even had his own .22 caliber rifle that he was allowed to shoot with adult supervision,
Are you seriously down to that level? Giving us one example and extrapolating that out to the 50 million households? Look at you, there is a reason you are getting baked alive in this thread and even the gun control advocates are not coming to your defense. You are not engaging in logical discussions that even they can support. You lost credibility back on post one.
This is why you got chased out of the true crime forum as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2013, 02:01 PM
 
1,214 posts, read 1,695,461 times
Reputation: 626
Using gun tragedies to push an agenda is sick!

Banning guns because of such horrible (but rare) events, is like wanting to ban cars because of drunk drivers. Y'all forget that most gun owners are not lunatics, just like most people who own cars are not drunk drivers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2013, 02:02 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
12,287 posts, read 9,818,580 times
Reputation: 6509
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dd714 View Post
Are you seriously down to that level? Giving us one example and extrapolating that out to the 50 million households? Look at you, there is a reason you are getting baked alive in this thread and even the gun control advocates are not coming to your defense. You lost credibility back on post one.
I agree. Let me go find an article where someone used a gun to save a life and now guns are used to protect 100 million people each year. Look at me, I'm just like KaaBoom now!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top