Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yes, those who have a only an abbreviated knowledge of history make that assertion. The Democratic Party in the South in the pre-civil rights era was a completely different party than the Democratic Party of today. Those that belonged o that party switched to the Republican Party after Nixon's Southern Strategy.
You also make contradictory claims. You claim that "terrorism in America it is leftist" and then use the KKK as the example, which means that you don't know that the KKK was far from a leftist organization.
Check out what type of people assassinate politicians.
So basically you guys are going to continue to sit on your hands like good little puppies while you continue to whine because the moment you do any uprising you will be labeled as Domestic Terrorists even if you think you aren't striking first.
They've not been nor will continue to sit on their hands. They've been busy preventing the left from violating the Constitution and their right to possess weapons.
They've not been nor will continue to sit on their hands. They've been busy preventing the left from violating the Constitution and their right to possess weapons.
-- Posted with TapaTalk
Good, while the right has been worried about the left violating one Amendment, the left has been busy worrying about the right violating the rest of the Amendments.
Good, while the right has been worried about the left violating one Amendment, the left has been busy worrying about the right violating the rest of the Amendments.
Really? It is the left that would love to enact the "Fairness" doctrine and complains about the Citizen United ruling.
Really? It is the left that would love to enact the "Fairness" doctrine and complains about the Citizen United ruling.
Actually Citizens United is so that the super rich can simply pour money into campaigns freely and try to get their own puppets elected as easily as possible and because it was called "citizens united" they managed to sucker the right wingers into believing that the bill was all in favor of the citizens and not the select few super rich.
Let me know when the right wants to stop fighting against preventing people from having full rights and freedom in this country.
Actually Citizens United is so that the super rich can simply pour money into campaigns freely and try to get their own puppets elected as easily as possible and because it was called "citizens united" they managed to sucker the right wingers into believing that the bill was all in favor of the citizens and not the select few super rich.
Let me know when the right wants to stop fighting against preventing people from having full rights and freedom in this country.
The 1st and14th Amendment covers the rich also, buddy. I realize you do not think it should.
The 1st and14th Amendment covers the rich also, buddy. I realize you do not think it should.
Yes those amendments do, but neither have anything to do with Citizens United...buddy. All Citizens United is the ability for the super rich to basically buy elections.
Wow this is the mother of all super long threads. Doesn't it wear any of you out?
It's like a marathon, you gotta pace yourself and take breaks.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
