Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-27-2013, 09:38 AM
 
Location: Massachusetts
10,029 posts, read 8,344,311 times
Reputation: 4212

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iamme73 View Post
Only because as a society we have decided that in order to work fulltime requires 40hrs a week or something close to for hours a week. This can be changed.
Let's say you own a business. Are you going to want to pay people the same for doing less work?

Last edited by Rick Roma; 09-27-2013 at 09:56 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-27-2013, 09:50 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,096,009 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghostrider275452 View Post
He may have set the standard, but unions negotiated for it around the country.
And companies happily went along so they once again, could run 3 full time shifts, allowing them to make more money without building more factories.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2013, 09:54 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,096,009 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoJiveMan View Post
Well excuse me for being dumb, and working two jobs most of my life.
Wait, you previously argued that people will become creative, invent for example, if they only worked part time. Now your telling me that your own projections, aren't true? Shocking..
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoJiveMan View Post
How many minimum wage slaves do you know of where the company or corporation they work for provides them with any benefits?.
The discussion isn't that some companies don't provide benefits, the discussion is government ENTICING companies not to offer them, or more accurately, punishing those who do.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoJiveMan View Post
By your measure, anyone working a forty hour week is entitled to benefits. Sorry, it don't work thataway.
Not at all. Why is it difficult for you to comprehend the difference between government punishing those who offer benefits, thus encouraging them to cut hours, thus making it worse for the employees? Why haven't you told us who will make up this difference in earnings when someone gets their hours cut by 25%?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2013, 09:56 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,096,009 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iamme73 View Post
Only because as a society we have decided that in order to work fulltime requires 40hrs a week or something close to for hours a week. This can be changed.
So you're suggesting people work less, and earn more in order to make up the difference.

Who exactly will buy these products if everyone is working part time? I guess we'll just have to off shore more jobs.. yep, more democratic stupidity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2013, 10:03 AM
 
Location: The Brat Stop
8,347 posts, read 7,239,563 times
Reputation: 2279
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Wait, you previously argued that people will become creative, invent for example, if they only worked part time. Now your telling me that your own projections, aren't true? Shocking..

The discussion isn't that some companies don't provide benefits, the discussion is government ENTICING companies not to offer them, or more accurately, punishing those who do.

Not at all. Why is it difficult for you to comprehend the difference between government punishing those who offer benefits, thus encouraging them to cut hours, thus making it worse for the employees? Why haven't you told us who will make up this difference in earnings when someone gets their hours cut by 25%?
Well, you did bring up benefits, so I expounded on that tidbit.

People will still follow their creativity, it's basically in all people, not just citizens of the USA. When you lose something, you try to make up for it one way or the other.

Now you're saying government is punishing people, do you feel that way about paying taxes you owe too?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2013, 10:27 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,464,288 times
Reputation: 27720
Government is restricting business with their "30 hrs is full time" ruling.
Restricting business ends up hurting the worker.

Those full time folks with benefits are not impacted.
It was those part time workers doing more than 30 hours that are now working less hours and have no insurance.

Employers had to either pay for insurance for them or face $2K/person fines.
So employers now insure their workers hit a wall at 29 hours.

Why did the government do this ? Why didn't they just leave well enough alone ?
They already gave individuals the ability to sign up. Why did the government go to great lengths to get even more people uninsured and underpayed ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2013, 10:36 AM
 
Location: A Nation Possessed
25,719 posts, read 18,788,778 times
Reputation: 22568
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Why did the government do this ? Why didn't they just leave well enough alone ?
They already gave individuals the ability to sign up. Why did the government go to great lengths to get even more people uninsured and underpayed ?
Because they are very good at finding something that, in their opinion, needs improvement... and then proceeding to exacerbate it or outright destroy it. Nothing new there. (this is of course a best case scenario, assuming no conspiracy on their part)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2013, 11:22 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,096,009 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoJiveMan View Post
Well, you did bring up benefits, so I expounded on that tidbit.
Obamacare, is supposed to be a benefit, isnt it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoJiveMan View Post
People will still follow their creativity, it's basically in all people, not just citizens of the USA. When you lose something, you try to make up for it one way or the other.
Once again, that isnt the point, the point is governent making it harder on those who cant make ends meet at 40 hours a week.. The current economic situation the nation is in, proves you are wrong..
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoJiveMan View Post
Now you're saying government is punishing people, do you feel that way about paying taxes you owe too?
I havent paid federal income taxes in 13 years.. but then I have a choice, most americans dont..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2013, 11:25 AM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,963 posts, read 22,143,591 times
Reputation: 13799
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghostrider275452 View Post
Unions pretty much dictated the 40 hour work week. Robber baron tyrants like Andrew Carnegie and Henry Frick demanded long work days/weeks and very low pay, unions negotiated for shorter hours and higher pay.
Curious how the people behind the corruption and tyranny can switch places, isn't it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2013, 11:40 AM
 
8,391 posts, read 6,295,442 times
Reputation: 2314
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Roma View Post
Let's say you own a business. Are you going to want to pay people the same for doing less work?
Let's not say I own a business because I don't.

My only point is that owners, should experiment more with schedules and working hours.

What if it is found that workers in some industries produce more over the course of a year if they work only 28 hours a week which is four 7 hour workdays? Who knows if everyone is working the 40hr grind because that is what everyone else is doing?

My point is this we don't know if working 40hrs a week is getting the most out of your workforce for all industries at all times, you might be actually be paying them more to produce less because of those hours.

I work in a refinery which is a 24hr 7 day a week industry, lots of over time.

I'd love schedules that focused on reducing our hours a week. And seeing how that impacts worker productivity.

This idea that 40hrs is this thing that can't be altered or questioned makes no sense to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:45 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top