Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-26-2013, 03:04 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,621,980 times
Reputation: 20674

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ringwise View Post
"Create" implies that there is a choice. ACA give you no choice, and therefore it is FORCED.
One can choose the level of risk they want to insure.
One can choose the carrier they want to insure them.
One can choose to not insures themselves and accept the consequences.


Too bad that there is no practical way to deny some level of medical service to those who choose not to take any responsibility for their own healthcare unless they could pay for service, when rendered.

As is, the cost of collecting and writing off bad debt is the cost of doing business and shared by all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-26-2013, 03:12 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,621,980 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by pnwmdk View Post

What, you think Congress will ever deign live like the rest of us?

Opinions are not facts. You made the claim that Congress has a beyond Cadillac Healthcare plan and it's free...

If you expect anyone to accept this as fact, please provide a link from a credible source.



There was a reason staffers were exempted from ALL requirements. Not by law, but by agency fiat. They were afraid that it might not be "good enough" for the elites who roam the halls of power.
Opinions are not facts.

A Republican Congressmen attached a bill to the ACA that required Congress and their staffers to obtain their insurance from private carriers on their state exchanges. That the federal government will continue to subsidize the cost of insurance by about 75%, as they do for all federal employees, has not changed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2013, 03:14 PM
 
9,470 posts, read 6,956,717 times
Reputation: 2177
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
One can choose the level of risk they want to insure.
One can choose the carrier they want to insure them.
One can choose to not insures themselves and accept the consequences.


Too bad that there is no practical way to deny some level of medical service to those who choose not to take any responsibility for their own healthcare unless they could pay for service, when rendered.

As is, the cost of collecting and writing off bad debt is the cost of doing business and shared by all.
Is that cost more, or is it less, than forcing everyone to buy a bad financial value ( Obamacare style insurance) and subsidizing all that purchasing with public money?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2013, 03:15 PM
 
9,470 posts, read 6,956,717 times
Reputation: 2177
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
Opinions are not facts.

A Republican Congressmen attached a bill to the ACA that required Congress and their staffers to obtain their insurance from private carriers on their state exchanges. That the federal government will continue to subsidize the cost of insurance by about 75%, as they do for all federal employees, has not changed.
Neither are laws.

The FACT is that it will simply be ignored.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2013, 03:15 PM
 
8,391 posts, read 6,285,710 times
Reputation: 2314
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
I never said people who have insurance would pay a fine. Put you reading ears on.

LOLOLOLOL Yes you did. Maybe you made a typo, but yes you said the fine was to force people from private insurance blah, blah, blah.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2013, 03:16 PM
 
9,470 posts, read 6,956,717 times
Reputation: 2177
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iamme73 View Post
LOLOLOLOL Yes you did. Maybe you made a typo, but yes you said the fine was to force people from private insurance blah, blah, blah.
Yes, that fine exists.

You see, in order to NOT pay the fine, you must buy QUALIFIED insurance plans.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2013, 03:26 PM
 
45,412 posts, read 27,002,505 times
Reputation: 23765
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
This began with an opinion that ACA will not deny claims. That's not the same thing as allowing people with preexisting conditions to buy insurance.

People who have been fortunate enough to be employed by employers who provide subsidized group health insurance were generally not denied coverage due to pre-existing conditions. Some states required a waiting time and some not so much.

People with individual policies and serious diagnosis often found themselves, in most states, in a position of being denied the ability to renew their insurance or buy insurance from another carrier. Such people may have been paying premiums for decades and found themselves uninsured once the going got tough.

There is no question that the inclusion of people with pre-existing conditions into new pools is a factor of the cost, no different than it is today for employer sponsored group health insurance or Medicare/Medicaid, for that matter.
I understand your point. And you are right.

However, a mass of people will hop off of private insurance because it will be cheaper in 2014. They will hop on the insurance when they need care and the insurance companies will have to pay out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2013, 03:28 PM
 
45,412 posts, read 27,002,505 times
Reputation: 23765
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iamme73 View Post
LOLOLOLOL Yes you did. Maybe you made a typo, but yes you said the fine was to force people from private insurance blah, blah, blah.
Where?

Here is my post.

Quote:
It looks like Congress, White House, etc. are not exempt.

The fining aspect is the means to move a bunch of people off of private insurance companies.

Initially, the fine is cheaper than having insurance.

By 2016, the roles reverse and it will be more expensive to pay the fine than to have insurance. But their hope is that by then, they will have drained the resources from the private insurance companies so that the government option is the only option remaining.

Oh yeah - throw in the fact that private insurance companies can not deny any claims - meaning people who do not pay into the risk pool can take resources from the risk pool. That will also help drain out insurance companies.

Then, yippee - single payer - which is also, single control.

Pretty devious if you ask me - in that this is NOT what was advertised for ObamaCare.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2013, 03:34 PM
 
Location: Sonoran Desert
39,028 posts, read 51,089,285 times
Reputation: 28227
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
I understand your point. And you are right.

However, a mass of people will hop off of private insurance because it will be cheaper in 2014. They will hop on the insurance when they need care and the insurance companies will have to pay out.
If they fail to sign up by April, they will have no insurance until at least January of 2015. The notion that you can just sign up whenever you get sick or injured is incorrect. People can only "hop on" during open enrollment. Also, they can't change plans, for example, to one that covers more if they get sick except during open enrollment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2013, 03:35 PM
 
8,391 posts, read 6,285,710 times
Reputation: 2314
Quote:
Originally Posted by pnwmdk View Post
Yes, that fine exists.

You see, in order to NOT pay the fine, you must buy QUALIFIED insurance plans.

Policies issued before 2010 ("grandfathered" health plans) don't have to adhere to all the new rights and protections offered by the Affordable Care Act.


Reality
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top