Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I came across some images of female circumcision I had never seen in the link below; discussing circumcision of women who have damaged/cut men's genitals as a punishment!:
" When women find it funny if a man's penis is cut or mutilated, they deserve the same thing inflicted on them" ....
And I think why not ? Why should we let those women get away with it? Would any woman be laughing at cases of male castration again knowing there is such a clear-cut punishment (circumcision)?
Because we don't really do the whole eye-for-an-eye thing here in civilized society. If you break someone's arm in a fight, you don't get your arm broken in return. You get arrested, you get a hearing or a trial and a judge determines your punishment. I guarantee, the judge won't order for you to have your own arm broken.
There are still a HUGE number of women in the world who get mutilated as a matter of practice. Circumcision has valid arguments in both directions, and certainly, the results are not horrible mutilation.
I'm not even sure why this needs discussion. Anyone who mutilates another person in ANY fashion is a monster.
Any boy/man in the US who was circumcized as an infant outside of a religious requirement should sue whoever signed the papers approving the mutilation of your genitals without your consent. Think its funny? Soon to come. Parents...if you had your male baby circ'd be prepared. One sucessful case (very likey, and soon) and all of ya will have your savings wiped out - and half of it will go in a lawyers pocket.. Leave the kid's winky alone - for your own good, if for no other reason!
There are still a HUGE number of women in the world who get mutilated as a matter of practice. Circumcision has valid arguments in both directions, and certainly, the results are not horrible mutilation.
I'm not even sure why this needs discussion. Anyone who mutilates another person in ANY fashion is a monster.
Any boy/man in the US who was circumcized as an infant outside of a religious requirement should sue whoever signed the papers approving the mutilation of your genitals without your consent. Think its funny? Soon to come. Parents...if you had your male baby circ'd be prepared. One sucessful case (very likey, and soon) and all of ya will have your savings wiped out - and half of it will go in a lawyers pocket.. Leave the kid's winky alone - for your own good!
Oh, please.
That's just absurd. No, I believe lawyers will try. I think the courts should simply refuse to even entertain such a lawsuit. And anyone who tries... Should be so ostracized for stupidity that they give up in shame.
Any boy/man in the US who was circumcized as an infant outside of a religious requirement should sue whoever signed the papers approving the mutilation of your genitals without your consent. Think its funny? Soon to come. Parents...if you had your male baby circ'd be prepared. One sucessful case (very likey, and soon) and all of ya will have your savings wiped out - and half of it will go in a lawyers pocket.. Leave the kid's winky alone - for your own good, if for no other reason!
I agree... It's the child's body and regardless of religion, it should be illegal for parents to mutilated a baby boy body. If they want to be circumcised, then it should be their choice.....
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.