Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This caught my eye awhile back during some Obama WH drama. So I have been keeping an eye out. They have been trying to get this through. Looks like they are working on it once again.
It is being spun as a protective bill, however, there are big issues up for grabs here. Mainly the definition of Journalist and Journalism. One should read through the bill and see the heavy areas that are being discussed.
quote:
Feinstein believes that a proposed media shield law should be applied only to who she refers to as “real reporters.” Feinstein chastises other reporters as “basement-dwelling, pajama-clad bloggers with no professional credentials”
If this bill were to be passed bye bye Faux Snooze that would rule
If you are referring to the particular network of similar sounding name, no I am afraid they would qualify.
All govt owned corporate Big 6 media, would qualify.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.