Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 09-30-2013, 09:35 PM
 
Location: California
37,121 posts, read 42,189,292 times
Reputation: 34997

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by VTHokieFan View Post
46% would blame Republicans
36% would blame Obama



Anyway, if only 46% are blaming Republicans aka less than the number of people who voted for Obama. I say "shut-er down"
Sadly there are many people who see this as a numbers game, a way to score points for their team. It's not.

 
Old 09-30-2013, 10:15 PM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,443,387 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
If the government doesn't get funded by October, it will shut down.

Republicans in the House have passed a bill that will fund all of the government at last year's levels, even including all the Democrats' pet projects from last year that Republicans (or at least conservatives) normally object to.

Democrats in the Senate have refused to pass that bill, or even vote on it, because it doesn't fund one new Dem pet project that wasn't part of the government last year, the ACA. But they are doing nothing to write a separate bill to fund that new pet project.

The more fanatical Democrats are insisting it's Republicans' fault that government isn't getting funded.

Can they get any sillier?

That's because Democrats made Obamacare a permanent entitlement, thereby insulating it from annual appropriations. One of my simple budget rules is that Congress should not deprive future Congresses of deciding what, where, and when to spend ny imposing permanent spending obligations on them. With Obamacare, spending is the default condition until Congress and the President decide to not spend, which makes anyone trying to stop spending a bad guy if it interferes with Business As Usual.

How about some people come out of the woodwork and run for office on this issue?
 
Old 10-01-2013, 02:02 AM
 
35,309 posts, read 52,274,165 times
Reputation: 30999
Quote:
Originally Posted by tinman01 View Post
Both sides will always maintain their hardliners. Some are very comfortable allowing others to think for them.
Some people just think liberal ideology makes more sense and others believe conservative ideals make more sense and they vote accordingly.For those who can vote liberal in one election and conservative in the next strikes me as people who decide on who to vote for by having others tell them who to vote for rather than rely on their own political ideals.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:05 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top