Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 11-20-2007, 05:28 PM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,862,853 times
Reputation: 2519

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by bily4 View Post
You think taking care of our vets is a "feel-good" thing? It is both morally and pragmatically the right thing to do. And if it is a government program then obviously the taxpayers all pitch in.

Vets volunteer. No vets=no freedom=no constitution=no federal government purview=no money or nice lifestyle for oz.

Luckily for the rest of us, the Supreme Courts have consistently taken the Hamiltonian interpretation that the Congress does indeed have the power to tax when it deems good for the general welfare of our citizens.

While, therefore, the power to tax is not unlimited, its confines are set in the clause which confers it, and not in those of § 8 which bestow and define the legislative powers of the Congress. It results that the power of Congress to authorize expenditure of public moneys for public purposes is not limited by the direct grants of legislative power found in the Constitution.”

By and large, it is for Congress to determine what constitutes the “general welfare.” The Court accords great deference to Congress’s decision that a spending program advances the general welfare,595 and has even questioned whether the restriction is judicially enforceable.596 Dispute, such as it is, turns on the conditioning of funds.

US Constitution Annotated - Spending for the General Welfare
In your 'outrage' you miss my point.

Providing the homeless with food and a home for free(for example) is a nice thing to do.
It was not however the 'job' of the federal gov't.

I am saddened that people like you seem to LOVE a government that gets to decide when and where its power ends.

Having lived in a socialist nation I can see where those who do not WANT to strive and succeed on their own may embrace it,especially if they benefit.

Sadly they like to make EVERYONE else pay for it.

Hopefully Paul will win and help put an end to this welfare mentality.

Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top