Quote:
Originally Posted by ambient
Germany also has...
Comprehensive health care (oh no! how come they haven't all died??)
|
Which is an unfunded liability which they have no money to pay in the Future.
By 2020, the average EU country will need to raise the tax rate to 55 percent of national income to pay promised benefits.
■ By 2035, a tax rate of 57 percent will be required.
■ By 2050, the average EU country will need more than 60 percent of its GDP to fulfill its obligations.
ISBN #1-56808-197-9
www.ncpa.org/pub/st/st319/st319.pdf
At present, the US has massive unfunded liabilities in the form of Social Security and Medicare.
Why don't you figure out how you are going to fund those programs through 2085 -- without causing more job losses --- and then get back to us.
If you cannot handle reality or facts, they got pills for that.
Also, you lied by omission.....
Rationing exists when...
1] Scarcity of physical resources and a perceived need for their allocation
2] Waiting lists and long waiting times
3] Denial of treatment
4] Discrimination between patients regardless of need
Those definitions stem from....
Allocating resources when their supply is limited (EIU Healthcare International)
The displacement of the interests of one group of patients by another (Spiers, J.,
The Realities of Rationing: ‘Priority Setting’ in the NHS, London)
How many of a given intervention will be provided, to whom, at what cost, and under what circumstances (Rationing Health Care, Brit. Medical Bull. 51)
Die kuenstliche Verknappung eines durchaus vorhandenen Angebots --- The artificial curtailment of supply when it is actually available (Cueni, T.,
Rationalisieren oder Rationieren?)
Germany rations its health care.
I'll let the German Minister of Health explain it to you....since he's a "socialist"....
"In the past 20 years, our overriding philosophy has been that the health system cannot spend more than its income." -- Franz Knieps German Minister of Health (2009)
Virtual budgets are also set up at the regional levels; these ensure that all participants in the system—including the health insurance funds and providers— know from the beginning of the year onward how much money can be spent. -- Franz Knieps German Minister of Health (2009)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ambient
A healthy middle class jobs structure that they protected from outsourcing to China and India (what a novel idea that no conservative has ever thought of)
|
Prove it. What specifically did Germany do?
German companies get "corporate welfare" to subsidize them, so that they don't go out of business.
Would you like me to dig up the posts where
you whined and cried about "corporate welfare" or would you rather do the honors?
How much money does Germany spend on National Defense?
You think Germany has aircraft carriers?
Really?
The US must spend enormous amounts of money on Defense, because the US must protect the Petro-Dollar at all costs, but many States are all too happy to use the Euro....or the Ruble....or the Yuan.
"German family firms have led the country's export boom...."
The endangered public company: The big engine that couldn
Get it?
Many of you snivel and whine about corporations hoarding cash.
Yes, hoarding cash is a smart thing to do in times of economic volatility, since hoarded cash is the only way a publicly traded corporation can protect itself from being "Zenithed."
Zenith did not have an cash....because Zenith did not have any profits.....because Zenith could sell its products globally and make a profit......but the Korean Life's Good Corporation did have cash, because it had profits, because it could sell its products globally and make a profit...
....and LG Corporation used the profits it got to buy up all the stock in the Zenith Corporation and now former-Zenith employees are working at McDonald's and Wal-Mart.
Who still doesn't get it?
In addition to hoarding cash, what else have corporations been doing?
Buying up their own stocks.
Why would a corporation buy back its own stocks? Gosh, I don't know, but obviously that drives up the price of the stock, while simultaneously giving the corporation protect from an hostile take-over, leveraged buy-out or forced merger.
Who on this forum can cite a text-book example discussed widely in Economics at university?
KKR Kravitz versus Kroger's
KKR Kravitz were corporate raiders, they tried an hostile take-over of Kroger's,
but Kroger's hoarded cash, and then used that massive amount of hoarded cash to stop the hostile take-over.
Many German --- and also French and Italian and Dutch --- companies are privately owned.....family owned.....they don't have stock, so they don't have to worry about being bought up and closed down by a foreign corporation, and the German government subsidizes them on top of that.
Geez, it's high-time some of you people take your first step into the world of Realityâ„¢.
Economically...
Mircea