Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Then you need to go tell your fellow thread starter for bringing it up.
But if there was NO polotical implications, why was it brought up?
Did I make this thread?
I didn't start the thread either. You are running on pure emotion, and you get defensive because you think your party is being unfairly criticized. I am here only to discuss the scenario concerning the theft. I don't give a rats ass who the AR was stolen from, and it has nothing to do with political parties. People like you see partisan politics in everything, and I think its a great shame.
You keep going on about that as if it were pertinent.
The point is, if you don't trust criminals to stay out of your home, and you claim to be a responsible gun owner, why on Earth would you leave weapons lying around unsecured?
Like I said, it sure makes it hard to take you gun folks seriously when you drop your own talking points like hotcakes just to defend some idiot GOP Congresswoman who has proven that she is not, in fact, a responsible gun owner like the rest of you claim you all are.
Perhaps you missed the little factoid that the gun belonged to her adult son who is the one who left it out and unsecured. Or perhaps you purposely ignored fact because it didn't support your desired to trash a GOP Congresswoman.
It was secured behind a closed garage door on private property.
But criminals don't obey the law! Surely you understand that "secure" isn't secure because criminals will break in and steal things against the law????
Or does talking point only work when it suits you gun nuts?
This congresswoman is another walking argument for requiring gun owners to carry liability insurance for their firearms. People need to take personal responsibility.
I didn't start the thread either. You are running on pure emotion, and you get defensive because you think your party is being unfairly criticized. I am here only to discuss the scenario concerning the theft. I don't give a rats ass who the AR was stolen from, and it has nothing to do with political parties. People like you see partisan politics in everything, and I think its a great shame.
Get over yourself....it happened, the ONLY reason it was brought up was because it was a GOP congress woman...nothing more nothing less...if you cannot see that, then I have no hope for you to understand anything going on in this thread.
Perhaps you missed the little factoid that the gun belonged to her adult son who is the one who left it out and unsecured. Or perhaps you purposely ignored fact because it didn't support your desired to trash a GOP Congresswoman.
Don't look now but your bias is showing.
Actually, I'm trashing you gun nuts. I only mentioned her political affiliation because that's why you people are falling all over yourselves defending her by ignoring your own repeatedly-stated principles about gun ownership.
To sum up this thread in the new gun nut meme:
Responsible gun owners know there's no need to properly secure their weapons because criminals will obey the law and never break into homes and steal them.
I suppose the NRA has approved these new talking points for you. Though as soon as the next little kid gets his hands on daddy's gun lying around on the kitchen counter, you'll all be right here, ranting about the "irresponsible" gun owner and blaming him. It's clear you're only defending this woman and her son because of her political affiliation.
But criminals don't obey the law! Surely you understand that "secure" isn't secure because criminals will break in and steal things against the law????
Or does talking point only work when it suits you gun nuts?
This congresswoman is another walking argument for requiring gun owners to carry liability insurance for their firearms. People need to take personal responsibility.
No, no, no. "Personal responsibility" is only for poor people with dark skin, and liberals.
This congresswoman is another walking argument for requiring gun owners to carry liability insurance for their firearms. People need to take personal responsibility.
Of course the burglar had nothing to do with the crime................
Actually, I'm trashing you gun nuts. I only mentioned her political affiliation because that's why you people are falling all over yourselves defending her by ignoring your own repeatedly-stated principles about gun ownership.
To sum up this thread in the new gun nut meme:
Responsible gun owners know there's no need to properly secure their weapons because criminals will obey the law and never break into homes and steal them.
I suppose the NRA has approved these new talking points for you. Though as soon as the next little kid gets his hands on daddy's gun lying around on the kitchen counter, you'll all be right here, ranting about the "irresponsible" gun owner and blaming him. It's clear you're only defending this woman and her son because of her political affiliation.
Don't look now, but ... well, you know.
What a great post....well not really, but good for you....
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
