Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-26-2013, 10:46 AM
 
8,630 posts, read 9,135,767 times
Reputation: 5989

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by stan4 View Post
Anyone can own stocks.
That is true. To deny the many the opportunity, the rip would be most obvious now wouldn't it? If you did not allow 401K or pensions into the system and have skin in the game, the gig would be up. Those 401ks and pensions don't amount to a hill of beans compared to a very select small minority who own much of the capital in the states---40-60%? There are a small amount of families that possess more gold then anytime in world history and that includes old euro royalty. Millions of middle class lost half of their 401ks and many lost completely their pensions. But the 1% didn't on the most part and got wealthier instead. Now, you can call that success, I myself call it a rip in the highest order.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-26-2013, 10:50 AM
 
Location: Upstate NY 🇺🇸
36,754 posts, read 14,825,823 times
Reputation: 35584
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
The Federal Reserve isn't just inflating markets but is shifting a massive amount of wealth from the middle class and poor to the rich. the Fed's policy of quantitative easing was inflating stocks and other assets held by wealthy investors like himself. But the price of making the rich richer.

Who owns assets—the rich, the billionaires. You think Warren Buffett hates this stuff?

Druckenmiller: Fed shifting money to rich from poor

LOL, there's no robbing of the poor going on here; one could reasonably believe (and I do) that the poor are robbing the middle class.

While I agree that the Fed's QE policy is making the market look artificially healthy (after all, there is nowhere else for people to put one's money), and investors are doing very well, don't forget that those with 401ks (many of whom are not longtime investors) are also benefitting.

Poor people have an increasing number of safety nets (thanks to the largesse of all taxpayers, including those in the middle class) and the wealthy, bless 'em, can take care of themselves. What's happening here is that we're moving towards two classes: the poor and the rich. And it's the middle class that's going to be moving downward.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2013, 11:03 AM
 
8,630 posts, read 9,135,767 times
Reputation: 5989
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
Collectively there is a lot of money to be had from the middle class. Don't be surprised if one day you wake up to find out that Obama and Reid now consider you rich so he use his class warfare rhetoric and will pit the American people against you so he can take more of your money.

How much is enough? As everyone knows it is never enough money, what makes people think they will always be given a pass when there is yet another government money grab.
Obama and Reid are not dictators. They are doing what they are told just like Bush and company! They are nothing but stewards forcing a huge transfer of wealth from the majority to a small ass group of people by and large. If Mitt Romney was President he'd be having a massive orgasm throughout his presidency.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2013, 11:04 AM
 
11,768 posts, read 10,261,651 times
Reputation: 3444
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmking View Post
That is true. To deny the many the opportunity, the rip would be most obvious now wouldn't it? If you did not allow 401K or pensions into the system and have skin in the game, the gig would be up. Those 401ks and pensions don't amount to a hill of beans compared to a very select small minority who own much of the capital in the states---40-60%? There are a small amount of families that possess more gold then anytime in world history and that includes old euro royalty. Millions of middle class lost half of their 401ks and many lost completely their pensions. But the 1% didn't on the most part and got wealthier instead. Now, you can call that success, I myself call it a rip in the highest order.
The stock market recovered as did the 401K's.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2013, 11:08 AM
 
Location: Alaska
7,502 posts, read 5,751,017 times
Reputation: 4885
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
The Federal Reserve isn't just inflating markets but is shifting a massive amount of wealth from the middle class and poor to the rich. the Fed's policy of quantitative easing was inflating stocks and other assets held by wealthy investors like himself. But the price of making the rich richer.

Who owns assets—the rich, the billionaires. You think Warren Buffett hates this stuff?

Druckenmiller: Fed shifting money to rich from poor
It amazes me folks don't see this.. You will also never see 6% interest rates because of Obummers massive debt..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2013, 11:13 AM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,730,963 times
Reputation: 13868
Quote:
Originally Posted by Delahanty View Post
LOL, there's no robbing of the poor going on here; one could reasonably believe (and I do) that the poor are robbing the middle class.

While I agree that the Fed's QE policy is making the market look artificially healthy (after all, there is nowhere else for people to put one's money), and investors are doing very well, don't forget that those with 401ks (many of whom are not longtime investors) are also benefitting.

Poor people have an increasing number of safety nets (thanks to the largesse of all taxpayers, including those in the middle class) and the wealthy, bless 'em, can take care of themselves. What's happening here is that we're moving towards two classes: the poor and the rich. And it's the middle class that's going to be moving downward.
Yes that is the big picture way of looking at it. The poor are robbing the middle class and the uber rich are robbing the middle class.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2013, 11:17 AM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,730,963 times
Reputation: 13868
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
One does not need income, to obtain wealth. Warren Buffets salary at Birkshire Hathaway is $100K a year..
To buy those assets requires money and in the case of the middle class person that is from income. Income buys the asset and in the case of stock hopefully produces passive income.

Warren Buffet is a hypocrite, a man whose career is a lesson in business and personal tax minimization, he is the last person who should be preaching about “fairness” when it comes to taxation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2013, 11:17 AM
 
8,630 posts, read 9,135,767 times
Reputation: 5989
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1 View Post
Oh, I believe it. I believe every word of it. I just do not know how to stop it.
Keep money out of politics. No super Pacs, no--companies are people too bs. No insider trading by government officials. Perhaps term limits too. None of this forcing people to purchase a for-profit product and then calling it a tax. Whether Obama care's intentions are good or not, its still a large transfer of money from a large group of folks to smaller group of well off folks, who lift no fingers, brake no sweat in the healthcare trade.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2013, 11:19 AM
 
8,104 posts, read 3,959,384 times
Reputation: 3070
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
And who pays the vast majority of taxes? The rich or course.
The top .5% pay an effective tax rate less than the 99.5% below them, especially since the top .5% make their wealth not through income but capital gains and financial investments.

They still pay more dollar wise, but the bottom 99.5% would be paying a lot more if the game was not skewed toward the top.

Also, 50% of American's do have a 401, yet .5% of American's at the top are the main beneficiaries of the financial markets because they have access to other people's money. If the stock market was working for everyone involved (those 50%) then the inequality in this country would not be as high.

The stock market has benefited disproportionately the well connected, insider traders, politicians, and and Banksters.

Who Rules America: An Investment Manager's View on the Top 1%

An Investment Manager's View on the Top 1%


The Upper Half of the Top 1%

Quote:
Membership in this elite group is likely to come from being involved in some aspect of the financial services or banking industry, real estate development involved with those industries, or government contracting. Some hard working and clever physicians and attorneys can acquire as much as $15M-$20M before retirement but they are rare. Those in the top 0.5% have incomes over $500k if working and a net worth over $1.8M if retired.

The higher we go up into the top 0.5% the more likely it is that their wealth is in some way tied to the investment industry and borrowed money than from personally selling goods or services or labor as do most in the bottom 99.5%. They are much more likely to have built their net worth from stock options and capital gains in stocks and real estate and private business sales, not from income which is taxed at a much higher rate. These opportunities are largely unavailable to the bottom 99.5%.
It must be nice to have a government bought and paid for to serve the top .5% at the expense to the rest of the country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2013, 11:22 AM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,730,963 times
Reputation: 13868
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Actually, most people use their income to buy depreciating assets, which is why we have a nation full of poverty strickened individuals.
Poor people spend every penny they get. The middle class as they become more successful buy liabilities and borrow to buy more liabilities. They get caught in the rat trap. The rich buy assets which increases their wealth. It's more involved but thats the basics of it. If a middle class person is smart or is a high income earner he also buys assets but as his income increases the government comes and grabs a bigger chunk of it making it harder for the middle class to build wealth which those in the political class already have.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:22 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top