Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
In the end Obama was the lousiest of candidates.
He had a track record to prove it too.
Hahaha worse than Rick Perry or Michelle Bachmann? Or vp Sarah Palin. At least Obama can walk and chew gum.But that just shows you the sad state of politics.
I believe he can but thats not saying much. If republicans want to win then stop putting forth stupid candidates. As I said earlier, Obama was a populist and that's how he got elected.
Yes common sense would have said Obama would have lost but how could anyone win when opposition was silenced, remember how people (with common sense) was shocked how the unemployment rate suddenly dropped. Remember the Obamaphone lady. Remember how Obama bombed the first debate, oh yes, and it was because of a video. Then going to the young and naive who thought it was all a game.
It was recently found that the employment numbers were fudged to look good. They play a dirty, dishonest game of politics -- win at any cost!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feltdesigner
Why did this psychic need a binder full of women?
Could this be an example of an Obama voter who doesn't have good comprehension skills? Or an example of the typical liberal's intentional misunderstanding of the English language?
Everyone knows what he meant, except the liberals who chose to pounce on it and make something of it that it wasn't.
It didn't take a rocket scientist to realize that Obama's epic failures and gross incompetence would continue as usual in the second term but Romney really was incredibly spot on (unfortunately).
It didn't take a rocket scientist to realize that Obama's epic failures and gross incompetence would continue as usual in the second term but Romney really was incredibly spot on (unfortunately).
Fyi, Romney did nothing but bring the same old supply side economics that have simply not worked. That's why
he lost.
Nonsense, Obama won because he was the 'fun' president. Nothing more, nothing less. Romney predicted that Obama's ideas would be an epic failure; however few liberals and independents listened; and insisted that Romney was just another 'old rich white guy' that America was "tired" of. Now a year later, borderline Dems and Independents are having 'buyer's remorse' wondering where things have gone wrong.
Now the GOP has the luxury of saying I "told you so" and the Dems have to answer to the failure of the economy's recovery and Obamacare, the two key issues that won him the election.
Even loyal Dems are getting tired of the "obstruction" excuse and the "I didn't know" attitude of this administration. He now stands at an abysmal approval rating at a lax 37%
Here's the Economist current cover of this month's issue...
You'll probably come back with Huffington's spin on it. Something more credible would be appreciated.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Y'all proved him wrong. 
Something more credible would be appreciated.
