Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-19-2013, 04:05 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,596,242 times
Reputation: 18521

Advertisements

Obama stiffs the historic Gettysburg Address Ceremonies, because Lincoln was a Republican.

Just the opposite of Obamacare, where 100% of Democrats supported it and zero Republicans
Giving former slaves and all blacks full citizenship and the right to vote. 100% of Republicans supported, with zero Democrat support.

1964 civil rights.... 100% Republican support, with 5% of democrats supported it.



Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.


Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battle-field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.


But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate -- we can not consecrate -- we can not hallow -- this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us -- that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion -- that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain -- that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom -- and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.




He didn't say all Democrats are created equal,.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-19-2013, 04:11 PM
 
Location: Better half of PA
1,391 posts, read 1,232,884 times
Reputation: 617
How do know why he didn't go?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2013, 04:16 PM
 
Location: San Francisco
8,982 posts, read 10,457,345 times
Reputation: 5752
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
1964 civil rights.... 100% Republican support, with 5% of democrats supported it.
If you're talking about the Congressional vote, you are 100% wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2013, 04:38 PM
 
11,768 posts, read 10,257,576 times
Reputation: 3444
Quote:
Originally Posted by pch1013 View Post
So why are so many of today's Republicans so droolingly nostalgic for the Confederacy?

And why -- since you mention the 14th Amendment -- do so many of today's Republicans want to repeal it?
I would imagine it's because it grants birthright citizenship, A.K.A. "anchor babies".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2013, 04:49 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,161,783 times
Reputation: 7875
I can only assume every president before Obama has never missed a Gettysburg Ceremony. Because that is the only way I can explain this outrage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2013, 05:19 PM
 
13,684 posts, read 9,003,085 times
Reputation: 10405
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
Obama stiffs the historic Gettysburg Address Ceremonies, because Lincoln was a Republican.

Just the opposite of Obamacare, where 100% of Democrats supported it and zero Republicans
Giving former slaves and all blacks full citizenship and the right to vote. 100% of Republicans supported, with zero Democrat support.

1964 civil rights.... 100% Republican support, with 5% of democrats supported it.



Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.


Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battle-field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.


But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate -- we can not consecrate -- we can not hallow -- this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us -- that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion -- that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain -- that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom -- and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.




He didn't say all Democrats are created equal,.
Why don't you re-think your post. For instance, only a youth would argue that 'Republicans' of today equal 'Republicans' of the Civil Rights era, or of the Civil War.

We must recall that using 'conservative' and 'liberal' can be more consistent when talking about long periods of time, instead of 'party labels'.

For instance, during the civil rights era, many "southern Democrats" eventually wound up becoming Republicans, since they did not believe in Civil Rights. Texas, of course, was Democrat for many a decade, until the late 1970s, when it become 'Republican'. The people themselves did not change that much, but the parties' positions did.

Hence, if we read your statement as "100 percent of Conservatives supported Civil Rights", it would be obviously a flawed statement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2013, 05:23 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,596,242 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
I can only assume every president before Obama has never missed a Gettysburg Ceremony. Because that is the only way I can explain this outrage.
150 years is usually significant as far as anniversaries go. He did say, fundamentally change.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2013, 05:26 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,596,242 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by legalsea View Post

Hence, if we read your statement as "100 percent of Conservatives supported Civil Rights", it would be obviously a flawed statement.
Had I said that.....
But I didn't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2013, 05:27 PM
 
Location: San Francisco
8,982 posts, read 10,457,345 times
Reputation: 5752
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
Had I said that.....
But I didn't.
You said that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 had "100% Republican support."

Where?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-19-2013, 05:28 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,161,783 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
150 years is usually significant as far as anniversaries go. He did say, fundamentally change.
Well if this upsets you, your head will explode when learn that Reagan snubbed the 125th Anniversary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:57 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top