Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The subject of this video was mainly non-metal CNC techniques (probably not a good choice on my part for the subject at hand).
But yeah, you spend the money (getting cheaper and cheaper) and a home CNC setup, with the right hardware/software......will let you do just about whatever you want with metal.
Even if you never learn the G Programming Language.....there will need to be quite computer literate
to effectively use the CAD/CAM/CNC software that is a lot like using Windows (GUI - graphical user interface)
Maybe look into SMP (sintered metal printing), not as strong as a forged or cast firearm......but better than plastic.
Very nice, the next ten years will be great to this idea, cheap metal printers are on the way.
Yeah, because why wouldn't we want people to manufacture their weapons? Especially fellows and all other who can't simply buy a gun because they don't qualify? A gun for everybody. This will solve all the programs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tickyul
Yeah, and watch the Dumdumocrats push harder and harder to BAN anything and everything that makes it easy to manufacture a weapon.
With 3-D printed plastic guns, and their supposed "undetectability," having been much in the news of late, it might sound odd that a legislator would try to sneak a printed gun ban through Congress, but last Thursday, Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) attempted to do just that. On the very day that Senator Bill Nelson (D-FL) introduced S. 1774, to extend the so-called "Undetectable Firearms Act" for one year, Schumer asked that the bill be passed with "unanimous consent."
In other words, Schumer had hoped to pass the bill without any debate, and without any of the other procedural "speed bumps" intended to prevent legislation from being forced through before anyone has an opportunity to object. From the Congressional Record:
Mr. SCHUMER. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that, as in legislative session, the Senate proceed to the consideration of S. 1774, a bill to reauthorize the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988 for 1 year, introduced earlier today; that the bill be read three times and passed and the motion to reconsider be laid upon the table with no intervening action.
S. 1774, we are told, differs from H.R. 1474 and S. 1149 in that those two bills are even more restrictive (and even more transparently not motivated by the claimed fear of "undetectable" guns) than the current, soon-to-expire law, because they would also ban printed magazines, and printed gun receivers, while S. 1774 ostensibly "only" keeps in place the current ban of entire firearms made with less than the mandated minimum quantity of metal--although the text of the legislation is not yet available, so we are evidently expected to take Nelson's and Schumer's word on that score.
Goes to show you why we can have or do anything fun or exceptional because a bunch of statist regressive like Chuck Schumer.
If we can hold out until December 9 we will be in the clear.
So you want assault weapons that can't be detected by metal detectors legal?
I know conservatives want assault weapons and high capacity mags legal (the weapons mass murderers choose to kill large numbers of our children in schools.)
And your not a gun lover, a real gun lover would have an intelligent conversation about gun safety. This thread is nothing but a political attack on democrats, with a bunch of Fox news followers fighting to make assault weapons that can pass metal detectors legal.
Any person with common sense and knowledge of guns, knows that assault weapons, high capacity mags, and weapons that are undetectable by metal detectors (are not needed by regular Americans, or wanted by sane educated gun owners.) But this does not stop uneducated psycho idiots, from wanting a assault weapon like they see in the movies.
Yeah, because why wouldn't we want people to manufacture their weapons? Especially fellows and all other who can't simply buy a gun because they don't qualify? A gun for everybody. This will solve all the programs.
HUM, so background checks for a sintered metal printer, 3d printer, cnc machine.......what else can the Insaneocrats cook up????????
The more they push the more we push back, the more they talk, they more we buy...they will lose this fight..
Well, the Insaneocrats will probably establish a team of police/stormtroopers in Connecticut to "visit" the "criminals" who did not register their ASSAULT RIFLES.
So you want assault weapons that can't be detected by metal detectors legal?
I know conservatives want assault weapons and high capacity mags legal (the weapons mass murderers choose to kill large numbers of our children in schools.)
And your not a gun lover, a real gun lover would have an intelligent conversation about gun safety. This thread is nothing but a political attack on democrats, with a bunch of Fox news followers fighting to make assault weapons that can pass metal detectors legal.
Any person with common sense and knowledge of guns, knows that assault weapons, high capacity mags, and weapons that are undetectable by metal detectors (are not needed by regular Americans, or wanted by sane educated gun owners.) But this does not stop uneducated psycho idiots, from wanting a assault weapon like they see in the movies.
You are aware the barrels would still be made of metal, as would the bullets, primers, and casings would be made of metal, even the propellant has metal in it..This idea that they would slip right though is a lie.
But then again you already know this, right? And are not being corrected by a "uneducated psycho idiot" right?
We want the rights of law abiding persons not be infringed upon. The fact that a hand full of people use these tools to commit a crime is not any reason to ban them.
What about the mall shooting or the navel yard shooting? both used a standard mossberg shotgun that would be legal is that treasonous "assault weapons" ban went though.
I am gun lover, I stand for up for my rights, this idea that gun safety includes gun control is a bad one the left uses all the time..
It is an attack on elected officials who refuse to obey the Constitution and limit the rights of Americans and laws that would harm industries..The fact they are Democarts makes no difference(but it is not surprising, not in the least)
Quote:
(are not needed by regular Americans, or wanted by sane educated gun owners.)
Its about the right to own them, need has not application here..But then again they guns and ammo that do not set off a metal detector do not exist..
But then again anyone who does not take your side and want to have their Right To Keep And Bear Arms, and the creative and means of production limited must be a "uneducated psycho idiots"
#1 agenda for dems removal of firearms from home owners.
the burning question, why?
We all know what they are.....and it never ends well...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
.
