Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-01-2013, 10:07 AM
 
12,973 posts, read 15,793,565 times
Reputation: 5478

Advertisements

It has been quite clear from day one that it was a covert CIA operation.

The "coverup" was classical government speak avoiding admitting it was a covert operation.

Steven was at least related to the spooks if not one.

All this has been obvious since the day of or after the incident.

Why can't the right at least find something else to ***** about? Obamacare implementation has much better legs.

And I find it amazing that the right thinks the left is naive about all this. I would think another example of the fictitious left thinking brought to you by the right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-01-2013, 10:16 AM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 17 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,546 posts, read 16,528,077 times
Reputation: 6029
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
This, to me, is basically stating the obvious. More problematic is that so many liberals defy logic in their own minds by refusing to believe that the CIA was involved in the Benghazi episode.....AND its resulting cover-up. All in an effort protect Barack Hussein Obama.

It's as clear as the grass is green. But yet in the diseased mind of a liberal, it's all about Republicans being on a "witch hunt" instead of acknowledging the massive failure of the United States Government.
LMFAO ROTF.

How would this be in any way a cover up to protect Barack Obama when Republicans claimed for an entire year that we should have been in Libya helping them over thrown Gaddafi ????

this entire thread makes no sense.

I have yet to see anyone on the left even care if we were giving guns to groups to over throw Gaddafi, heck, i would think most supported it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2013, 10:32 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,442,711 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
LMFAO ROTF.

How would this be in any way a cover up to protect Barack Obama when Republicans claimed for an entire year that we should have been in Libya helping them over thrown Gaddafi ????

this entire thread makes no sense.

I have yet to see anyone on the left even care if we were giving guns to groups to over throw Gaddafi, heck, i would think most supported it.
Ummm..Benghazi happened after we invaded Libya. Gaddafi was already long dead via torture.
Gaddafi's guns were being transported to Syria to arm the rebels to overthrow Assad.



Better to Remain Silent and Be Thought a Fool than to Speak and Remove All Doubt
Mark Twain
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2013, 10:57 AM
 
3,404 posts, read 3,448,351 times
Reputation: 1684
Its iran contra all over again. Exceipt that time the media wanted reagans hide.

This time it was worse because americans died and it was blamed on a video.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2013, 01:59 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 21,996,065 times
Reputation: 5455
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Ummm..Benghazi happened after we invaded Libya. Gaddafi was already long dead via torture.
Gaddafi's guns were being transported to Syria to arm the rebels to overthrow Assad.



Better to Remain Silent and Be Thought a Fool than to Speak and Remove All Doubt
Mark Twain
This is the problem these liberals who are running around screaming don't have one clue what is even going on. This one thinks Benghazi was about Obama trying to overthrow momar. It's just unbelievable how clueless these folks really are. Astounding actually. That is what you get when you listen to nothing but 24/7 liberal news I guess instead of trying to find out what happened. The internet is an amazing mechanism if used properly. When all you have in your favorites are huff post and move on dot org you got problems.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2013, 04:44 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,227 posts, read 26,172,300 times
Reputation: 15620
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike0618 View Post
Its iran contra all over again. Exceipt that time the media wanted reagans hide.

This time it was worse because americans died and it was blamed on a video.
Iran-Contra this is not, we didn't offer a bribe to a country that had hostages,but since you bring up Reagan how long did the senate investigation hearings last on the Beirut Barracks Bombing that killed 241 soldiers in 1983. Why didn't we protect them better, where was the intelligence.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2013, 05:10 PM
 
27,119 posts, read 15,300,057 times
Reputation: 12055
Beirut was not an attack that went on for hours & hours while the Administration sat there and did nothing and told others to not do anything either.....when they could have.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2013, 06:33 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,227 posts, read 26,172,300 times
Reputation: 15620
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluesjuke View Post
Beirut was not an attack that went on for hours & hours while the Administration sat there and did nothing and told others to not do anything either.....when they could have.
Yes it didn't last long but 241 were killed instantly but the scrutiny was nothing like today, we had no alternative to rescue anyone in Benghazi.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2013, 06:37 PM
 
11,086 posts, read 8,539,703 times
Reputation: 6392
Let's see. O supported the Muslim Brotherhood takeover of Egypt.

And he is giving weapons to Al Qaida.

Does anyone still believe he is not a radical Islamist?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2013, 06:53 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,227 posts, read 26,172,300 times
Reputation: 15620
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goinback2011 View Post
Let's see. O supported the Muslim Brotherhood takeover of Egypt.

And he is giving weapons to Al Qaida.

Does anyone still believe he is not a radical Islamist?
Do you have any facts or are you just making stuff up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:47 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top