Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Are denialists peddling opinion polls printed in business magazines and calling them science? Again? I'm quite sure it was explained last time that such a poll is garbage.
Now if a denialist could show that the people actually doing the research and analyzing the data supported his claims, that might mean something.
Are denialists peddling opinion polls printed in business magazines and calling them science? Again? I'm quite sure it was explained last time that such a poll is garbage.
Now if a denialist could show that the people actually doing the research and analyzing the data supported his claims, that might mean something.
alarmists pedaling polls of only 1372 IPCC scientists and calling the representative of every scientist in the world. so which sounds more accurate to you? i already know your answer, you side with the IPCC against 31,000 other scientists.
actually i get hammered by the left because i dont buy into their bullcrap on climate change, the right however tends to like what i say.
No no no. It's not "the left", it's "those not on the right". Why only those not on the right can tell the difference between scientific research and, say, an opinion poll in a right-wing business magazine is a mystery, but there it is.
These climate change debates are certainly entertaining, but of no use that I can see...What we think will have no effect on climate, as it will continue to warm, or not and only time will tell.
alarmists pedaling polls of only 1372 IPCC scientists and calling the representative of every scientist in the world. so which sounds more accurate to you? i already know your answer, you side with the IPCC against 31,000 other scientists.
The IPCC report sounds more accurate to me because it is backed by science. What backs your silly Forbes opinion poll up? That they polled engineers? Awesome. I'm an engineer and I think denialists are clowns.
The IPCC report sounds more accurate to me because it is backed by science. What backs your silly Forbes opinion poll up? That they polled engineers? Awesome. I'm an engineer and I think denialists are clowns.
The IPCC report sounds more accurate to me because it is backed by science. What backs your silly Forbes opinion poll up? That they polled engineers? Awesome. I'm an engineer and I think denialists are clowns.
Awww that so optimistic. No the 31,000 are not polled engineers. It was a open online poll to anyone that apparently required you to select your engineering degree if you wanted to answer their poll. So of course everyone who responded said they had a degree of some sort. Cross their hearts!
Now theres some awesome polling science there for ya!
These climate change debates are certainly entertaining, but of no use that I can see...What we think will have no effect on climate, as it will continue to warm, or not and only time will tell.
I agree with your first sentence.
But warming has "paused". And that's from the alarmists.
Wrong again....Scientists must squeeze in the work along other obligations. The scientists are not paid for their work on the IPCC.
And you also probably believe in the tooth fairy.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
