Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: What Administration is most responsible for Income Inequality?
Politicians in DC and thier policies are actually not responsible for the shape of this country, it's a strawman and is up to the individual. 5 10.20%
Politicians in DC are responsible but are blameless when they rejoin back into a large corporation or bank. 2 4.08%
Puppet Barack Obama and Wall Street since QE and Bailouts occured on his watch. 22 44.90%
Ronald Reagan and Trickle Down Economics Policies. 24 48.98%
I don't care and this topic needs to die since my stocks are going through the roof. 3 6.12%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 49. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-06-2013, 06:30 AM
 
30,063 posts, read 18,663,011 times
Reputation: 20880

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by J746NEW View Post
We hear constantly how politicians effect millions of Americans and their lives with their policies throughout this board. It is left vs right constantly and the impacts each "party" has on this country.


So in your opinion, which "party" is most responsible for the ever growing divide in wealth inequality?

None of the above-

It should be the Wilson administration, as they instituted

The Federal Reserve
Income tax
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-06-2013, 06:31 AM
 
3,406 posts, read 3,449,665 times
Reputation: 1685
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
I don't think any single admin is responsible. Education creates opportunity, and opportunity put people on track to becoming successful. Our education system is pathetic, and the recent (and past) comparisons to other industrialized countries show how far we have fallen. This problem will take a whole generation to fix, but apparently the lawmakers are unwilling to do anything about it.
People make thier own opertunity. If it was education all college grads would be rich.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2013, 06:56 AM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,730,722 times
Reputation: 14745
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tilt11 View Post
Is this the new distraction? Where is this inequality?
mostly in the ownership of financial assets and the capital gains from those assets.

Quote:
You work at McDonalds, don't expect to become rich. You want to earn more money, work harder, try something different, take some risks.
that's a red herring. nobody expects to get rich working at mcdonalds. the issue is about macroeconomics, and the bias that exists towards the financial, insurance, and real estate industries.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2013, 06:57 AM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,730,722 times
Reputation: 14745
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
uhm, income equality? I surely hope the surgeon that is about to operate on me is paid better than a burger flipper.
a better question is whether that surgeon is better paid than the trader or bank executive. (you know, the sort of people whose income comes tax-preferred in the form of carried interest.)

we have a huge distortion in the labor market that is pulling smart people away from more productive fields, and instead into finance, because that's where the money gets printed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2013, 06:59 AM
 
25,021 posts, read 27,930,716 times
Reputation: 11790
Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy View Post
Dang! I agree with you. Are you turning over a conservative leaf?
This is the problem with hyperpartisans like yourself. Just because someone is a Democrat, doesn't mean they are stupid. Teapublicans don't have a monopoly on "common sense"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2013, 06:59 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,621,806 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike0618 View Post
People make thier own opertunity. If it was education all college grads would be rich.
Yes, they do, as long as they have the basic tools like basic education. If you cannot succeed with collage education, then you have only yourself to blame.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2013, 07:01 AM
 
Location: NJ
23,550 posts, read 17,223,445 times
Reputation: 17590
There is no income inequality beyond pay outside established market data.

Income inequality is a tool used to divide the nation.

It is an embellished financial concept the ignorant throughout history have been sucked in by people who do not have their best interest in mind.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2013, 07:01 AM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,730,722 times
Reputation: 14745
Quote:
Originally Posted by J746NEW View Post
We hear constantly how politicians effect millions of Americans and their lives with their policies throughout this board. It is left vs right constantly and the impacts each "party" has on this country.


So in your opinion, which "party" is most responsible for the ever growing divide in wealth inequality?
OP, you can't seem to ask a coherent question about presidential administrations or political parties --

but if you want my opinion, Nixon's decision to eliminate the convertibility of dollars to gold is a key driver of income inequality.

This massive shift changed the rules and regulations of the financial industry, giving them far more dollars to loan out from the federal reserve... a huge advantage over other American industries. This is sometimes referred to as the "financialization of the u.s. economy."

http://cas.umkc.edu/econ/economics/f...7/Krippner.pdf
http://cog.kent.edu/CareyCatoLetter.htm
http://www.peri.umass.edu/fileadmin/...n/chapter1.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2013, 07:02 AM
 
4,412 posts, read 3,958,755 times
Reputation: 2326
Calling it "income inequality" is patently false. Incomes have never been equal in capitalist systems.

The problem is wage stagnation for the middle and lower income families and the flow of wealth upward. That started during the trickle-down tax policies of Reagan and was exacerbated by the bad free trade deals signed by Clinton that off-shored high-paying low skill jobs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2013, 07:06 AM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,730,722 times
Reputation: 14745
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Mon View Post
Calling it "income inequality" is patently false. Incomes have never been equal in capitalist systems.
it is a question of degrees of equality
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:43 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top