Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-07-2013, 09:29 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,747,599 times
Reputation: 35920

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by armory View Post
Which has nothing to do with teen drinking. Well, maybe a little, but really.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-07-2013, 09:39 PM
 
Location: Tampa Bay Burbs
136 posts, read 210,976 times
Reputation: 197
I lived in Northwest Indiana when I was 18. Back then the drinking age in Indiana was 21, but it was 19 in Illinois and 18 in Michigan. It would take me 10 minutes to drive to Illinois and 30 minutes to drive to Michigan. The drinking age needs to be the same in all states. Not 18 but 19 is ok because you are probably out of high school and more likely socializing more with the over 18 instead of under 18 crowd.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2013, 09:50 PM
 
10,181 posts, read 10,257,364 times
Reputation: 9252
Quote:
Originally Posted by armory View Post
Your point being.....?
Can't help you if you couldn't figure it out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2013, 10:38 PM
 
10,181 posts, read 10,257,364 times
Reputation: 9252
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmking View Post
My only issue is the bolded above. There used to be in fact training. I was able to drink at 18 legally and when I did it was around those over 21 often times. In my case I did learn how to act while drinking. 18 year olds now sneak their drinks and often hang with younger kids who do not know how to act and or drink because of the lack of experience. I wonder what europeans have to say on this subject.
My point remains that there is no official training for "drinking" in the same way 18 year olds in the military are officially trained to handle "situations"/guns/etc. And the fact remains that no one signs up to drink while under-aged and goes through beer/cosmopolitan boot camp.

Who cares what Eurotrash thinks?

Europeans don't care. They're too busy living off of their happy socialist government, and the few who fund it, while sipping on any alcohol they can get with the pennies left over for them after paying their HUGE taxes.

Why do you think the legal age is so low or non-existent in the greater EU socialist countries? Let 'em find that crutch early in life and get addicted to it so they don't understand how they are REALLY being screwed over when they grow up.

Keep 'em drunk or stoned from day one. Makes for a lot happier sheep.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2013, 10:45 PM
 
1,496 posts, read 1,855,397 times
Reputation: 1223
Quote:
Originally Posted by gretsky99 View Post
If a 18 year old is old enough to join the military why shouldn't he or she be allowed to purchase alcohol.

Seriously your considered old enough to give up your life for your country but not old enough to drink in your country.
because the 18 year olds that volunteer for armed services are the best we have to offer. And the ones that don't for the most part are idiots. And since we'd be giving the right to drink to 95% of the idiots, who will then get behind a wheel and drive and run into people.

And I don't mean to disparage 18 year olds that don't volunteer for armed services, but the fact is most 18 year olds have very poor judgement. I was an idiot when I was 18. Most of us were idiots.

Setting the legal limit at 18 would increase alcohol related fatalities on the road by an immense measure. This isn't Europe where young people can jump on a train or bus or walk to their local pub. The USA is a huge country and we have a massive DUI problem already.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2013, 11:05 PM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,848,488 times
Reputation: 18304
I hate to say it but no generally. I am ok tho lowering it to 15 8 on Military bases.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2013, 11:28 PM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,358,834 times
Reputation: 7990
Drinking age of 158 would be ok with me, too. Imagine how much health care costs that would save us.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2013, 12:11 AM
 
544 posts, read 610,368 times
Reputation: 474
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaseMan View Post
I hate to say it, but no. Lowering the drinking age to 18 again will just lead to an increase of drunk driving accidents and deaths. That's the reason it was raised back up to 21 years ago.
LIES!

It has already been proven that raising the drinking age to 21 did not decrease overall drunk driving accidents and deaths. It merely shifted the average age of the drunk drivers by about 2-4 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2013, 08:11 AM
 
582 posts, read 779,134 times
Reputation: 766
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyHarley View Post
LIES!

It has already been proven that raising the drinking age to 21 did not decrease overall drunk driving accidents and deaths. It merely shifted the average age of the drunk drivers by about 2-4 years.
Based on your own statement, it is very likely deaths and accidents were reduced. If the average age of drunk driver was increased by 2-4 years, then the number of drunk drivers had to have decreased. Fewer drunk drive mean fewer accidents and deaths due to drunk drivers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2013, 08:13 AM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,747,599 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyHarley View Post
LIES!

It has already been proven that raising the drinking age to 21 did not decrease overall drunk driving accidents and deaths. It merely shifted the average age of the drunk drivers by about 2-4 years.
Actually, I believe that is untrue. Please post some stats with source.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:53 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top