U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-18-2013, 07:58 PM
 
39,213 posts, read 20,334,087 times
Reputation: 12734

Advertisements

Did you watch the movie and do you think many of the things that were predicted are coming true?

Undermining our allies. Unfortunately, I wasn’t wrong. Wielding a weaponized national debt and a disdain for our standing in the world, President Obama draws us nearer and nearer to the dystopia that I warned against in 2016.

Obama 2016, love him or hate him, you don't know him. Watch the video

[vimeo]80177893[/vimeo]
Exclusive "2016" Update with Dinesh D'Souza on Vimeo
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-19-2013, 07:21 AM
 
4,130 posts, read 3,854,346 times
Reputation: 3041
LoL, a conspiracy theorist that has never met or talked to anyone who knows Obama some how has the dish on Obama's secret life...because psychic powers or something. More like psychosis. Most of the premise is that Obama didn't spend all of the first 17 years of his life in America (to Dinesh Hawaii is not America), from a person who spent the first 17 years of his life in...Mumbai, India.

That people believe this tragedy of a film should qualify as signs of mental illness or disease.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2013, 07:32 AM
 
8,287 posts, read 11,828,704 times
Reputation: 4948
If you don't like the national debt maybe you should have started complaining when "Jello brains" Reagan was President instead.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2013, 07:46 AM
 
Location: North America
19,634 posts, read 12,431,714 times
Reputation: 8282
All of a sudden the national debt is a big deal. Funny it wasn't so when Reagan, Bush 1, Clinton and Bush 2 were running it up.

Brown guy phobia rears it's head again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2013, 08:16 AM
 
6,867 posts, read 2,517,651 times
Reputation: 3730
Quote:
Originally Posted by carterstamp View Post
All of a sudden the national debt is a big deal. Funny it wasn't so when Reagan, Bush 1, Clinton and Bush 2 were running it up.

Brown guy phobia rears it's head again.
Nah, it isn't race. Right now, the party in power is the one favored by the MSM, so every attack on the President, just like with Clinton and Carter (yes, I remember it), was seen by the media as unprecedented, racist (yes, criticism against Clinton's debt up to 1995 was seen as racist because he championed the poor minority and felt their pain), and indicator of the worst politics ever. They championed debt as needed to get stuff done.

Now go check the stories from MSM while Reagan, GHWB and Dubyah were in office. Not so flattering, and to them, the national debt was a huge crisis. FFS, listen to Obama in 2006 and in 2008 on the campaign trail speaking about how tragic running up debt and having huge deficits was. See a pattern yet? OK, let me help here....

THE PARTY NOT IN POWER SAYS WHATEVER THE PARTY IN POWER IS DOING WILL DESTROY THE COUNTRY, MAYBE THE WHOLE PLANET. Never changes, never has, never will. Elect a Republican tomorrow, and every Democrat who currently does cartwheels and gyrations to apologize and excuse debt increase under Obama will start mewling about debt again and referencing "Clinton's surplus" which is actually part owned by Gingrich and Dole.

How do I know? Look at how the media and Democrats treat the issues of Libya, Egypt, Iraq, and Afghanistan since Jan 2009. Apparently, changing the occupant of the White House made garrisoning and interventionism all hip and cool again. Come Jan 2017, if a Republican is in the White House, Democrats will go right back to hating war, being peaceniks, calling Republicans imperialists, etc. OH, and like we didn't get daily tears and agony from Democrats for the whole 8 years of Bush? Even when he approved legislation written by Democrats and sponsored by Teddy K and his cohorts, he was wrong, evil, stupid, etc. Stop crying, this is what you get when your guy is in charge...half the country will hate him and bash him for something.

tl/dr - politics as usual, no racism involved in bashing Obama, Dems will be crying just as hard the instant a Republican takes the White House.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2013, 08:17 AM
 
4,572 posts, read 2,975,126 times
Reputation: 3261
Wow, the idiot leftist brigade is out in full here.

We were all right about little barry soetero and the left was completely wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2013, 08:38 AM
 
Location: North America
19,634 posts, read 12,431,714 times
Reputation: 8282
Quote:
Originally Posted by Volobjectitarian View Post
Nah, it isn't race. Right now, the party in power is the one favored by the MSM, so every attack on the President, just like with Clinton and Carter (yes, I remember it), was seen by the media as unprecedented, racist (yes, criticism against Clinton's debt up to 1995 was seen as racist because he championed the poor minority and felt their pain), and indicator of the worst politics ever. They championed debt as needed to get stuff done.

Now go check the stories from MSM while Reagan, GHWB and Dubyah were in office. Not so flattering, and to them, the national debt was a huge crisis. FFS, listen to Obama in 2006 and in 2008 on the campaign trail speaking about how tragic running up debt and having huge deficits was. See a pattern yet? OK, let me help here....

THE PARTY NOT IN POWER SAYS WHATEVER THE PARTY IN POWER IS DOING WILL DESTROY THE COUNTRY, MAYBE THE WHOLE PLANET. Never changes, never has, never will. Elect a Republican tomorrow, and every Democrat who currently does cartwheels and gyrations to apologize and excuse debt increase under Obama will start mewling about debt again and referencing "Clinton's surplus" which is actually part owned by Gingrich and Dole.

How do I know? Look at how the media and Democrats treat the issues of Libya, Egypt, Iraq, and Afghanistan since Jan 2009. Apparently, changing the occupant of the White House made garrisoning and interventionism all hip and cool again. Come Jan 2017, if a Republican is in the White House, Democrats will go right back to hating war, being peaceniks, calling Republicans imperialists, etc. OH, and like we didn't get daily tears and agony from Democrats for the whole 8 years of Bush? Even when he approved legislation written by Democrats and sponsored by Teddy K and his cohorts, he was wrong, evil, stupid, etc. Stop crying, this is what you get when your guy is in charge...half the country will hate him and bash him for something.

tl/dr - politics as usual, no racism involved in bashing Obama, Dems will be crying just as hard the instant a Republican takes the White House.

Everyone is screaming about the debt, and not a peep before. All of this doom and gloom and disaster scenario is nonsense. The Tea party, founded on a great principle, was hijacked by the extreme right wingnuts.

As for my brown guy statement, I don't base it upon the honest criticism of Obama, because he deserves plenty, but the utter crap I see offered (birther, muslim, gay, civilian army, indocrination, the ever popular "we're doomed" and Obama will force a third term pile of crap). That, my friend is solely based upon brown guy phobia.

and I'm not a democrat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2013, 08:50 AM
 
4,130 posts, read 3,854,346 times
Reputation: 3041
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed from California View Post
We were all right about little barry soetero and the left was completely wrong.
Awww, that is so cute. Obviously things like birtherism was totally proved right
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2013, 09:23 AM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
22,873 posts, read 16,254,255 times
Reputation: 12785
Better title for this waste of digital space: "Mr. D'Souza desperately seeking relevance."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2013, 09:33 AM
 
Location: Florida
22,244 posts, read 9,457,094 times
Reputation: 18171
Shouldn't this thread about a film released in 2012 be moved to the Entertainment Forum? I believe the reviews were bad to middling calling the film simplistic and boring.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top